• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险评估和受试者工作特征曲线。

Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):895-8. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100208X. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1017/S003329171100208X
PMID:22017918
Abstract

Risk assessment is now regarded as a necessary competence in psychiatry. The area under the curve (AUC) statistic of the receiver operating characteristic curve is increasingly offered as the main evidence for accuracy of risk assessment instruments. But, even a highly statistically significant AUC is of limited value in clinical practice.

摘要

风险评估现在被视为精神病学中的一项必要能力。接收器操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)统计数据越来越多地被作为风险评估工具准确性的主要证据。但是,即使 AUC 具有高度统计学意义,在临床实践中也只有有限的价值。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves.风险评估和受试者工作特征曲线。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):895-8. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100208X. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
2
A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.一种通过自助法进行受试者工作特征曲线分析的全局拟合优度检验。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Mar 9.
3
Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.风险预测中受试者工作特征曲线的应用与误用
Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):928-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402.
4
Brief checklists for assessing violence risk among patients discharged from acute psychiatric facilities: a preliminary study.急性精神科设施出院患者暴力风险评估简要清单:一项初步研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(3):243-8. doi: 10.1080/08039480600780532.
5
The partial area under the summary ROC curve.汇总ROC曲线下的部分面积。
Stat Med. 2005 Jul 15;24(13):2025-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.2103.
6
Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.评估新标志物的附加预测能力:从ROC曲线下面积到重新分类及其他。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.2929.
7
[Evaluation of myelin basic protein levels with receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].利用受试者工作特征曲线评估髓鞘碱性蛋白水平以诊断多发性硬化症
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2009 Feb;29(2):250-2.
8
Evaluating risk assessments using receiver operating characteristic analysis: rationale, advantages, insights, and limitations.使用受试者工作特征分析评估风险评估:原理、优势、见解和局限性。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Jan-Feb;31(1):23-39. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2050. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术患者炎症标志物的诊断准确性:受试者工作特征曲线分析
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744.
10
Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.肝脏纤维化标志物诊断评估中受试者工作特征曲线下面积的变异性:活检长度和破碎程度的影响
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar 15;25(6):733-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03252.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-dimensional comparison of abdominal obesity indices and insulin resistance indicators for assessing NAFLD.多维度比较腹型肥胖指标与胰岛素抵抗指标用于评估非酒精性脂肪肝。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):2161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19657-6.
2
Evidence-based sentencing and scientific evidence.循证量刑与科学证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 14;14:1309141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1309141. eCollection 2023.
3
Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts.对罗夏墨迹测验在欧洲法庭应用的批判性综述。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 26;29(2):183-205. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1894260. eCollection 2022.
4
A Comprehensive Review of Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Major Mental and Neurological Disorders and Suicide: A Biostatistical Perspective on Data Mining.重大精神和神经疾病及自杀的计算机辅助诊断综述:数据挖掘的生物统计学视角
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):393. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030393.
5
Covert and Implicit Influences on the Interpretation of Violence Risk Instruments.对暴力风险评估工具解读的隐性和潜在影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Jul 21;24(2):292-301. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1197817. eCollection 2017.
6
The limitations and future of violence risk assessment.暴力风险评估的局限性与未来
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):25-26. doi: 10.1002/wps.20394.
7
[Interpersonal violence in the context of affective and psychotic disorders].[情感障碍和精神障碍背景下的人际暴力]
Nervenarzt. 2016 Jan;87(1):53-68. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-0040-6.