• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估血流储备分数时瑞加德松的临床实用性。

Clinical utility of regadenoson for assessing fractional flow reserve.

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.011
PMID:22017933
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of regadenoson, in comparison with adenosine, for assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate coronary artery stenoses (CAS).

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve is an established invasive method for assessing the physiological significance of CAS. Regadenoson, a selective A(2A) receptor agonist, is an approved hyperemic agent for pharmacological stress imaging, but its role for measuring FFR is unknown.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study enrolled 25 consecutive patients with intermediate CAS discovered during elective angiography (25 lesions). In each patient, FFR of the CAS was measured first by IV adenosine (140 μg/kg/min), followed by IV regadenoson (400 μg bolus). The intrapatient FFR correlation between adenosine and regadenoson was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 63 ± 11 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58 ± 11%. Most patients were male (52%) and had hypertension (84%) and dyslipidemia (84%), with 24% having diabetes mellitus and 20% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The CAS was visually estimated during angiography (mean 58 ± 9%) and most often found in the left anterior descending coronary artery (48%). A strong, linear correlation of FFR was noted with adenosine and regadenoson (r = 0.985, p < 0.001). A hemodynamically significant lesion (FFR ≤ 0.80) was present in 52% with no reclassification of significance between adenosine and regadenoson. No serious events occurred with administration of either drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a single IV bolus of regadenoson is as effective as an intravenous infusion of adenosine for measuring FFR and, given its ease of use, should be considered for FFR measurement in the catheterization laboratory.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估瑞加德松(regadenoson)与腺苷相比评估中间冠状动脉狭窄(CAS)的血流储备分数(FFR)的疗效。

背景

FFR 是评估 CAS 生理意义的一种已确立的有创方法。瑞加德松是一种选择性 A2A 受体激动剂,是一种用于药物应激成像的已批准的促充血剂,但它在测量 FFR 方面的作用尚不清楚。

方法

这项前瞻性、单中心研究纳入了 25 例在选择性血管造影中发现的中间 CAS 连续患者(25 处病变)。在每位患者中,首先通过 IV 腺苷(140μg/kg/min)测量 CAS 的 FFR,然后通过 IV 瑞加德松(400μg 推注)测量。评估了腺苷和瑞加德松之间的患者内 FFR 相关性。

结果

平均年龄为 63±11 岁,平均左心室射血分数为 58±11%。大多数患者为男性(52%),患有高血压(84%)和血脂异常(84%),24%患有糖尿病,20%患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病。CAS 在血管造影期间进行了目测评估(平均 58±9%),并且最常发生在前降支冠状动脉(48%)。FFR 与腺苷和瑞加德松之间存在很强的线性相关性(r=0.985,p<0.001)。在 52%的患者中存在血流动力学显著狭窄(FFR≤0.80),但在腺苷和瑞加德松之间没有意义的重新分类。两种药物的使用均未发生严重不良事件。

结论

我们的结果表明,瑞加德松的单次 IV 推注与静脉内输注腺苷一样有效,用于测量 FFR,并且鉴于其易用性,应考虑在导管实验室中用于 FFR 测量。

相似文献

1
Clinical utility of regadenoson for assessing fractional flow reserve.评估血流储备分数时瑞加德松的临床实用性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.011.
2
Use of regadenoson for measurement of fractional flow reserve.使用雷卡地诺生测量血流储备分数。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb 15;83(3):369-74. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25055. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
3
Pooled comparison of regadenoson versus adenosine for measuring fractional flow reserve and coronary flow in the catheterization laboratory.导管实验室中用于测量血流储备分数和冠状动脉血流的瑞加诺生与腺苷的汇总比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(5):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
4
Comparison of intravenous adenosine and intravenous regadenoson for the measurement of pressure-derived coronary fractional flow reserve.比较静脉内腺苷和静脉内瑞加德松在压力衍生冠状动脉血流储备分数测量中的应用。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Feb 22;8(10):1166-71. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I10A180.
5
Single bolus intravenous regadenoson injection versus central venous infusion of adenosine for maximum coronary hyperaemia in fractional flow reserve measurement.在血流储备分数测量中,单次静脉推注瑞加诺生与腺苷中心静脉输注用于最大冠状动脉充血的比较。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec;11(8):905-13. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_10.
6
Intravenous regadenoson with aminophylline reversal is safe and equivalent to intravenous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurements.静脉注射雷加迪松并使用氨茶碱进行逆转对于测量血流储备分数是安全的,且等同于静脉注射腺苷。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1348-1352. doi: 10.1002/clc.23052. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Comparison of regadenoson and nitroprusside to adenosine for measurement of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于测量血流储备分数的瑞加德松和硝普钠与腺苷的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Effects of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine on the assessment of fractional flow reserve.腺苷冠状动脉内给药剂量增加对血流储备分数评估的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.004.
9
Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve.冠状动脉内硝普钠与静脉内腺苷评估血流储备分数的疗效和安全性比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(3):540-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24652. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
10
Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of adenosine for measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve.冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射腺苷用于测量冠状动脉血流储备分数的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001781.

引用本文的文献

1
[Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: alternative hyperemic, nonhyperemic, and angiographic indexes].[冠状动脉狭窄的功能评估:替代性充血、非充血和血管造影指标]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Jun 13;6(3):224-234. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000446. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Assessing the Real-World Safety of Regadenoson for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Insights from a Comprehensive Analysis of FAERS Data.评估雷加昔布用于心肌灌注成像的真实世界安全性:来自对FAERS数据综合分析的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 10;14(6):1860. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061860.
3
Differences in coronary microcirculation measurements during regadenoson vs. adenosine - induced hyperemia.
雷加曲班与腺苷诱导充血时冠状动脉微循环测量的差异。
Cardiol J. 2025;32(1):19-25. doi: 10.5603/cj.97857. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Coronary Physiology: Delivering Precision Medicine?冠状动脉生理学:提供精准医疗?
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 27;23(5):158. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2305158. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic indices: Essential tools for percutaneous coronary interventions.血流储备分数与非充血指数:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的重要工具。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Apr 6;11(10):2123-2139. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2123.
6
Adenosine vs Regadenoson Pharmacologic Stress Differs in Women with Suspected Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) Study.腺苷与雷加得诺药理学应激在疑似冠状动脉微血管功能障碍女性中的差异:女性缺血综合征评估-冠状动脉血管功能障碍(WISE-CVD)研究报告
Cardiovasc Disord Med. 2019;2019. doi: 10.31487/j.cdm.2019.01.01. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
7
Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的冠状动脉功能评估:现状与未来方向。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23;9:934279. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934279. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腺苷与雷加腺苷用于评估血流储备分数的比较疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Cardiol. 2022 May 26;14(5):319-328. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i5.319.
9
Quantitative myocardial perfusion response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.腺苷和雷卡地诺生诱导的心肌灌注定量反应在疑似冠心病患者中的变化。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Feb;29(1):24-36. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02731-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Safety and efficacy of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside for the assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.冠状动脉内硝普钠用于评估冠状动脉血流储备分数的安全性和有效性。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S245-S249. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 5.