Suppr超能文献

髂股静脉支架置入术治疗下肢静脉淤滞症状

Iliac-femoral venous stenting for lower extremity venous stasis symptoms.

作者信息

Alhalbouni Saadi, Hingorani Anil, Shiferson Alexander, Gopal Kapil, Jung Daniel, Novak Danny, Marks Natalie, Ascher Enrico

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;26(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.033. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous outflow obstruction may play a role in patients with chronic venous stasis symptoms who fail to improve despite conventional modalities of treatment that focus on the reflux component of the disease with little attention to the possibility of an obstructive component. The introduction of minimally invasive venous stenting using venography and intravenous ultrasonography (IVUS) provides the ability to treat the "obstructive" component of the disease.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of 56 limbs in 53 patients with chronic venous stasis symptoms. Initial transcutaneous Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of the inferior vena cava, iliac, femoral, greater saphenous, and perforator veins was performed looking for any evidence of deep venous thrombosis, superficial venous thrombosis, perforator veins, and reflux (location and degree). Afterword, the patients were managed in the conventional fashion (leg elevation, compression, and great saphenous vein (GSV) and perforator ablation, if present) for a period of 3 months. If ulcer healing was not noted, iliac-femoral venography and IVUS were undertaken. A significant stenosis was defined as a 50% reduction in vein cross-sectional area as measured by IVUS.(1,2,3) Stenotic lesions were managed with stenting followed by balloon angioplasty. Patients were followed up for ulcer healing or improvement of stasis symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 56 limbs, 10 (17.8%) had postthrombotic changes, 7 (12.5%) had incompetent perforators, and 27 (48.2%) had an incompetent superficial venous system. In the stented group (n = 29), 3 limbs had perforator ablation alone, 13 limbs had GSV ablation alone, and 1 limb had both perforator and GSV ablation. In the unstented group (n = 27), 10 limbs had GSV ablation alone, and 3 limbs had both perforator and GSV ablation. The overall incidence of deep reflux was 51.8%; 17 of 29 limbs (58.6%) in the stented group had evidence of deep reflux, and 12 of 27 limbs (44.4%) in the unstented group had deep reflux. All venograms except one (98.2%) were performed under local anesthesia with sedation. The procedure was performed in an ambulatory setting in 69.6% (39 of 56) of the limbs. CEAP clinical severity class distribution was as follows: C2, 4%; C3, 16%; C4, 18%; C5, 5%; C6, 57%. Over half of the limbs (29 of 56) were found to have stenotic lesions and required stenting. Eight patients (11 limbs) did not return for ulcer healing assessment. The majority (19 of 29) of limbs in the stented group had a CEAP of 6. Among the patients with CEAP 6 who returned for follow-up (n = 26), 7 had no evidence of stenosis and required no stenting. Only one of those (14.3%) healed his ulcers after 3 months (average follow-up of 4.8 months). The remainder 19 limbs were found to have stenotic lesions and underwent stenting. The ulcers healed in 11 of those (58%) over a period of 1 week to 8 months (average of 5 months), with average follow-up of 3.6 months (p = 0.08). The cumulative primary and secondary patency rates were 93.1% (27 of 29) and 100% (29 of 29), respectively. Two stent thromboses occurred within 4 weeks of the initial procedure. Both occurred in patients with postthrombotic obstruction. One patient developed a superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm.

CONCLUSION

Over half of our patients with open ulcers had stenotic lesions. The ulcers healed in 58% of the stented limbs. That indicates that outflow obstruction may play a significant role in patients with chronic venous stasis symptoms, especially those with open ulcers who failed to respond to other treatment modalities. The procedure itself is relatively safe and simple and can be performed on an ambulatory basis.

摘要

背景

静脉流出道梗阻可能在慢性静脉淤滞症状患者中起作用,尽管传统治疗方法侧重于疾病的反流成分,而很少关注梗阻成分的可能性,但这些患者仍未能改善。使用静脉造影和静脉内超声(IVUS)的微创静脉支架置入术为治疗疾病的“梗阻”成分提供了可能。

方法

我们对53例有慢性静脉淤滞症状的患者的56条肢体进行了回顾性研究。最初对下腔静脉、髂静脉、股静脉、大隐静脉和穿静脉进行经皮多普勒超声评估,以寻找深静脉血栓形成、浅静脉血栓形成、穿静脉和反流(位置和程度)的任何证据。之后,患者接受为期3个月的传统治疗(抬高患肢、加压,如果存在大隐静脉(GSV)和穿静脉,则进行消融)。如果未观察到溃疡愈合,则进行髂股静脉造影和IVUS检查。IVUS测量静脉横截面积减少50%被定义为显著狭窄。狭窄病变采用支架置入术,随后进行球囊血管成形术。对患者进行随访,观察溃疡愈合情况或淤滞症状的改善情况。

结果

在这56条肢体中,10条(17.8%)有血栓形成后改变,7条(12.5%)有功能不全的穿静脉,2条(48.2%)有功能不全的浅静脉系统。在支架置入组(n = 29)中,3条肢体仅进行了穿静脉消融,13条肢体仅进行了大隐静脉消融,1条肢体同时进行了穿静脉和大隐静脉消融。在未置入支架组(n = 27)中,10条肢体仅进行了大隐静脉消融,3条肢体同时进行了穿静脉和大隐静脉消融。深静脉反流的总体发生率为51.8%;支架置入组29条肢体中的17条(58.6%)有深静脉反流证据,未置入支架组27条肢体中的12条(44.4%)有深静脉反流。除1例(98.2%)外,所有静脉造影均在局部麻醉加镇静下进行。69.6%(56条肢体中的39条)的手术在门诊进行。CEAP临床严重程度分级分布如下:C2,4%;C3,16%;C4,18%;C5,5%;C6,57%。超过一半的肢体(56条中的29条)发现有狭窄病变,需要置入支架。8例患者(11条肢体)未返回进行溃疡愈合评估。支架置入组的大多数肢体(29条中的19条)CEAP为6级。在返回随访的CEAP 6级患者(n = 26)中中,7例无狭窄证据且无需置入支架。其中只有1例(14.3%)在3个月后(平均随访4.8个月)溃疡愈合。其余19条肢体发现有狭窄病变并接受了支架置入术。其中11条(58%)的溃疡在1周至8个月(平均5个月)内愈合,平均随访3.6个月(p = 0.08)。累积的原发性和继发性通畅率分别为93.1%(29条中的27条)和100%(29条中的29条)。在初次手术后4周内发生了2例支架血栓形成。两者均发生在血栓形成后梗阻的患者中。1例患者发生了股浅动脉假性动脉瘤。

结论

我们超过一半有开放性溃疡的患者有狭窄病变。58%的置入支架肢体的溃疡愈合。这表明流出道梗阻可能在慢性静脉淤滞症状患者中起重要作用,尤其是那些对其他治疗方式无反应的开放性溃疡患者。该手术本身相对安全、简单,可在门诊进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验