Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, University of Genoa, Italy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Nov;107(5):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
The efficacy of specific immunotherapy always has been evaluated by clinical scores (symptoms or medication intake). Nonetheless, specific immunotherapy possesses some special or "additional" effects, including the carryover effect and the preventive actions, which are unique. Those effects are the consequence of the complex mechanism of action, which induces profound and persistent modifications in the immune response to allergens. The literature is reviewed to evaluate the available experimental data on this.
The main databases (EmBase, Medline, Scopus) were searched.
Clinical trials of immunotherapy, either randomized or not, including placebo-controlled trials, were selected.
Currently, the carryover effect (persistence of the benefit after stopping the treatment) is well ascertained for injection immunotherapy, whereas fewer data are available for the sublingual route. On the contrary, the demonstration of the prevention of asthma onset relies on 2 randomized studies for sublingual immunotherapy, and 1 single study for subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Although additional confirmatory data are needed, possibly obtained with a rigorous methodology, the long-lasting and preventive effects of specific immunotherapy always should be taken into account when the efficacy is evaluated. The additional effects also may have relevant socioeconomic implications.
特异性免疫治疗的疗效一直以来都是通过临床评分(症状或药物摄入)来评估的。然而,特异性免疫治疗具有一些特殊的或“额外的”作用,包括持续性效应和预防作用,这是其独特之处。这些作用是作用机制复杂的结果,它会在免疫应答过敏原方面引起深刻而持久的改变。本文旨在评估这方面的现有实验数据。
主要数据库(EmBase、Medline、Scopus)进行了检索。
选择了免疫治疗的临床试验,包括随机和非随机试验,包括安慰剂对照试验。
目前,注射免疫治疗的持续性效应(停止治疗后仍保持疗效)已经得到很好的证实,而舌下免疫治疗的数据则较少。相反,舌下免疫治疗有 2 项随机研究和 1 项皮下免疫治疗的单中心研究证明了预防哮喘发作的作用。
尽管需要额外的确认性数据,可能需要采用严格的方法学来获得,但在评估疗效时,始终应考虑特异性免疫治疗的持久和预防作用。额外的作用也可能具有相关的社会经济学意义。