• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舌下免疫疗法治疗3至18岁儿童过敏性鼻炎的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in pediatric patients 3 to 18 years of age: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials.

作者信息

Penagos Martin, Compalati Enrico, Tarantini Francesco, Baena-Cagnani Rodrigo, Huerta Jose, Passalacqua Giovanni, Canonica Giorgio Walter

机构信息

Allergy & Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Aug;97(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60004-X.

DOI:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60004-X
PMID:16937742
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, LILACS, and CINAHL databases from January 1966 to February 10, 2006, was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of SLIT in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in patients 18 years or younger were selected. Outcomes measured were symptom scores and rescue medication use. Analysis was performed with standardized mean differences (SMDs) and a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seventy articles were identified and reviewed. Ten studies, published between 1990 and 2004, fulfilled the selection criteria. Five hundred seventy-seven patients were initially included in the studies. Of these patients, 484 (245 SLIT and 239 placebo) had a final clinical evaluation and could be evaluated. A relevant heterogeneity due to widely differing scoring systems was found. Overall, there was a significant reduction in both symptoms (SMD, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-0.10; P = .02) and medication use (SMD, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-0.06; P = .03) after immunotherapy. The subanalyses performed for treatment duration and type of allergen showed that SLIT for more than 18 months and with pollen extracts was effective compared with SLIT courses shorter than 18 months and with mites.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed that,compared with placebo, SLIT with standardized extracts is effective in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis.

摘要

目的

评估舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的疗效。

数据来源

对1966年1月至2006年2月10日期间的EMBASE、MEDLINE、LILACS和CINAHL数据库进行了全面检索。

研究选择

选取了针对18岁及以下患者的SLIT治疗过敏性鼻炎的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。测量的结果为症状评分和急救药物使用情况。采用标准化均数差(SMD)和随机效应模型进行分析。

结果

共识别并审阅了70篇文章。1990年至2004年发表的10项研究符合入选标准。这些研究最初纳入了577例患者。其中,484例(245例接受SLIT治疗,239例接受安慰剂治疗)进行了最终临床评估并可进行评价。发现由于评分系统差异很大存在显著异质性。总体而言,免疫治疗后症状(SMD,0.56;95%置信区间,1.01 - 0.10;P = 0.02)和药物使用(SMD,0.76;95%置信区间,1.46 - 0.06;P = 0.03)均有显著降低。对治疗持续时间和过敏原类型进行的亚组分析表明,与疗程短于18个月且使用螨提取物的SLIT相比,使用花粉提取物且治疗超过18个月的SLIT有效。

结论

该荟萃分析结果表明,与安慰剂相比,使用标准化提取物的SLIT对患有过敏性鼻炎的儿科患者有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in pediatric patients 3 to 18 years of age: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials.舌下免疫疗法治疗3至18岁儿童过敏性鼻炎的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Aug;97(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60004-X.
2
The efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mites respiratory allergy: results of a GA2LEN meta-analysis.舌下免疫治疗尘螨呼吸过敏的疗效:GA2LEN 荟萃分析结果。
Allergy. 2009 Nov;64(11):1570-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02129.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
3
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-centre study on the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen.一项关于舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)治疗季节性草花粉过敏性鼻结膜炎儿童疗效和安全性的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照多中心研究。
Allergy. 2004 Dec;59(12):1285-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00627.x.
4
Efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with grass allergens for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis-based comparison.皮下和舌下免疫疗法治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效:基于荟萃分析的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Nov;130(5):1097-1107.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Randomized controlled trial of high-dose sublingual immunotherapy to treat seasonal allergic rhinitis.高剂量舌下免疫疗法治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Oct;114(4):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.058.
6
Efficacy of sublingual swallow immunotherapy in children with severe grass pollen allergic symptoms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.舌下含服吞咽免疫疗法治疗重度草花粉过敏症状儿童的疗效:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Allergy. 2004 May;59(5):498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00457.x.
7
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.过敏性鼻炎的舌下免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD002893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002893.
8
[Preventive immunotherapy].[预防性免疫疗法]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 May-Jun;28(3):89-93.
9
Assessment of sublingual immunotherapy efficacy in children with house dust mite-induced allergic asthma optimally controlled by pharmacologic treatment and mite-avoidance measures.评估在通过药物治疗和避免接触螨虫措施实现最佳控制的屋尘螨诱发过敏性哮喘儿童中舌下免疫疗法的疗效。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 Feb;18(1):47-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00475.x.
10
Clinical efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with tree pollen extract in children.儿童舌下含服花粉提取物免疫疗法的临床疗效与安全性
Allergy. 2006 Oct;61(10):1177-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01190.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses.舌下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效与安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析概述
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09664-7.
2
Effects of Sublingual Duster Mite Drops on Lung Function and Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Children with Multiple and Single Allergic Respiratory Diseases.舌下尘螨滴剂对多种和单一过敏性呼吸道疾病儿童肺功能和呼气一氧化氮的影响。
Can Respir J. 2020 Nov 4;2020:7430936. doi: 10.1155/2020/7430936. eCollection 2020.
3
EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.
EAACI 过敏原免疫治疗用户指南。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 May;31 Suppl 25(Suppl 25):1-101. doi: 10.1111/pai.13189.
4
Allergic Endotypes and Phenotypes of Asthma.哮喘的过敏性内型和表型。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):429-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.008.
5
Allergen Immunotherapy and Atopic Dermatitis: the Good, the Bad, and the Unknown.变应原免疫治疗与特应性皮炎:有好有坏,仍有未知。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019 Nov 27;19(12):57. doi: 10.1007/s11882-019-0893-z.
6
Morphofunctional analysis of antigen uptake mechanisms following sublingual immunotherapy with beads in mice.舌下免疫治疗用微球后抗原摄取机制的形态功能分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0201330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201330. eCollection 2018.
7
Critical appraisal of the clinical utility of sublingual immunotherapy in allergy.舌下免疫疗法在过敏治疗中的临床效用的批判性评估。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Jun 18;4:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.002. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.
8
Enhanced efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy by liposome-mediated delivery of allergen.脂质体介导变应原递送增强舌下免疫疗法的疗效
Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Nov 22;12:8377-8388. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S137033. eCollection 2017.
9
Effects of specific allergen immunotherapy on biological markers and clinical parameters in asthmatic children: a controlled-real life study.特异性变应原免疫疗法对哮喘儿童生物标志物和临床参数的影响:一项对照现实生活研究。
Clin Mol Allergy. 2017 Apr 3;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12948-017-0064-5. eCollection 2017.
10
Clinical practice recommendations for allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: the Italian consensus report.儿童变应原特异性免疫治疗的临床实践建议:意大利共识报告。
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Jan 23;43(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0315-y.