Suppr超能文献

利用静态和动态视网膜图像评估早产儿视网膜病变中的血管疾病进展。

Evaluation of vascular disease progression in retinopathy of prematurity using static and dynamic retinal images.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):544-551.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure accuracy and speed for detection of vascular progression in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) from serial images. Two strategies are compared: static side-by-side presentation and dynamic flickering of superimposed image pairs.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative study.

METHODS

Fifteen de-identified, wide-angle retinal image pairs were taken from infants who eventually developed plus disease. Image pairs representing vascular disease progression were taken ≥1 week apart, and control images without progression were taken on the same day. Dynamic flickering pairs were created by digital image registration. Ten experts independently reviewed each image pair on a secure website using both strategies, and were asked to identify progression or state that images were identical. Accuracy and speed were measured, using examination date and ophthalmoscopic findings as a reference standard.

RESULTS

Using static images, experts were accurate in a mean (%) ± standard deviation (SD) of 11.4 of 15 (76%) ± 1.7 image pairs. Using dynamic flickering images, experts were accurate in a mean (%) ± SD of 11.3 of 15 (75%) ± 1.7 image pairs. There was no significant difference in accuracy between these strategies (P = .420). Diagnostic speed was faster using dynamic flickering (24.7 ± 8.3 seconds) vs static side-by-side images (40.3 ± 18.3 seconds) (P = .002). Experts reported higher confidence when interpreting dynamic flickering images (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Retinal imaging provides objective documentation of vascular appearance, with potentially improved ability to recognize ROP progression compared to standard ophthalmoscopy. Speed of identifying vascular progression was faster by review of dynamic flickering image pairs than by static side-by-side images, although there was no difference in accuracy.

摘要

目的

从连续图像中测量早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)血管进展的检测准确性和速度。比较了两种策略:静态并排呈现和叠加图像对的动态闪烁。

设计

前瞻性比较研究。

方法

从最终发展为加病的婴儿中获取了 15 对已识别的广角视网膜图像。血管疾病进展的图像对相隔至少 1 周拍摄,而无进展的对照图像则在同一天拍摄。动态闪烁对通过数字图像配准创建。十位专家分别使用两种策略在安全网站上独立查看每对图像,并要求他们识别进展或表示图像相同。使用检查日期和检眼镜检查结果作为参考标准,测量准确性和速度。

结果

使用静态图像,专家在 15 对(76%±1.7)图像中的准确率为 11.4(%)±1.7。使用动态闪烁图像,专家在 15 对(75%±1.7)图像中的准确率为 11.3(%)±1.7。这两种策略的准确性没有显着差异(P=0.420)。使用动态闪烁时诊断速度更快(24.7±8.3 秒),而使用静态并排图像时(40.3±18.3 秒)(P=0.002)。专家在解释动态闪烁图像时报告了更高的信心(P=0.001)。

结论

视网膜成像提供了血管外观的客观记录,与标准检眼镜相比,可能具有更好的识别 ROP 进展的能力。与静态并排图像相比,通过查看动态闪烁图像对来识别血管进展的速度更快,但准确性没有差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of vascular disease progression in retinopathy of prematurity using static and dynamic retinal images.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):544-551.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
2
Influence of Computer-Generated Mosaic Photographs on Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis and Management.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov 1;134(11):1283-1289. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3625.
3
Retinopathy of prematurity management using single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;146(2):298-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
4
Expert Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity From Computer-Based Image Analysis.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):651-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0611.
5
Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity intraphysician agreement between ophthalmoscopic examination and image-based interpretation.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1222-1228.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 May 23.
6
Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 1;136(7):803-810. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1934.
7
Diagnostic Discrepancies in Retinopathy of Prematurity Classification.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(8):1795-1801. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 May 27.
8
Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;125(11):1531-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.11.1531.
9
Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: diagnostic impact of field of view.
Retina. 2012 Jun;32(6):1148-55. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31823ac3c3.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in Plus Disease Diagnosis using Single and Serial Images.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Dec;6(12):1122-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Telemedicine Applications in Pediatric Retinal Disease.
J Clin Med. 2017 Mar 23;6(4):36. doi: 10.3390/jcm6040036.
3
Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Diagnostic Trends in 2016 Versus 2007.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Retinopathy of Prematurity: Imaging in retinopathy of prematurity: where are we, and where are we going?
J AAPOS. 2016 Dec;20(6):474-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Improving Diagnosis by Ranking Disease Severity and Using Quantitative Image Analysis.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2345-2351. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Teleophthalmology: improving patient outcomes?
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 10;10:285-95. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80487. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparison of retinal image evaluation techniques in novice clinicians.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Apr;2(2):025502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.025502. Epub 2015 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive value of pre-plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 May;129(5):591-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.63.
2
Automated alternation flicker for the detection of optic disc haemorrhages.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;90(7):645-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02094.x. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
3
Detection of progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy using automated alternation flicker with stereophotography.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;129(4):521-2. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.310. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
4
Stanford University network for diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (SUNDROP): 36-month experience with telemedicine screening.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Jan-Feb;42(1):12-9. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100929-08. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
5
Comparison of stereo disc photographs and alternation flicker using a novel matching technology for detecting glaucoma progression.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(6):629-34. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100830-02. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;39(1):23-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02399.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
7
Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: quantitative analysis of vascular change.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct;150(4):468-475.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.027.
10
Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in the United States: 1997 through 2005.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;148(3):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验