Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62702, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):758-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
This study examined patient demographics, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition in those undergoing nonelective revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) vs elective rTHA. Data from 23 000 patients with hip revisions from 2005 through 2007 were extracted from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. We examined patient admission status, demographics, length of stay, and discharge location. We found that patients undergoing nonelective rTHA were older, were female, had more comorbidities, stayed an excess of 1.61 days in the hospital, and required a skilled care facility after discharge compared with those undergoing elective rTHA. We found that rTHA outcomes varied based on patient hospital admission status. Patients who elected to have rTHA had less comorbidities, cost, and likelihood of being discharged into a skilled care facility.
本研究调查了非择期翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)与择期 rTHA 患者的人口统计学特征、住院时间和出院去向。从 2005 年至 2007 年的髋关节翻修患者的医疗保健成本和利用项目全国住院患者样本数据库中提取了 23000 例患者的数据。我们检查了患者入院状况、人口统计学特征、住院时间和出院地点。我们发现,与择期 rTHA 患者相比,接受非择期 rTHA 的患者年龄更大,女性更多,合并症更多,住院时间多 1.61 天,出院后需要入住熟练护理机构。我们发现,rTHA 的结果因患者入院状况而异。选择进行 rTHA 的患者合并症较少,费用较低,且更有可能出院到熟练护理机构。