Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Trials. 2011 Dec;8(6):716-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511424421. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
The relationship and roles among the steering committee, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), and the sponsor of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) must be carefully defined to ensure the integrity of the trial.
We present an unusual scenario that arose during the conduct of a large RCT in Canada that involved the relationship of the steering committee and the DSMB with the peer review sponsor.
Case study of a large RCT conducted in Canada and a commentary on the roles and responsibilities of the steering committee, DSMB, and sponsor.
This case illustrates the need for funding agencies to understand the importance of respecting the independence of the DSMB and the need to keep confidential emerging trends regarding study results, including the conditional probability, during the conduct of a trial.
在随机临床试验 (RCT) 中,指导委员会、数据安全监测委员会 (DSMB) 和赞助商之间的关系和角色必须仔细定义,以确保试验的完整性。
我们提出了一个在加拿大进行的大型 RCT 中出现的不寻常情况,涉及指导委员会和 DSMB 与同行评审赞助商的关系。
对加拿大进行的大型 RCT 的案例研究,以及对指导委员会、DSMB 和赞助商的角色和责任的评论。
本案例说明了资助机构需要理解尊重 DSMB 独立性的重要性,并且在试验进行期间需要对研究结果的新兴趋势保密,包括条件概率。