Service d'Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Leukemia. 2012 Jan;26(1):73-85. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.310. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
Treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved over the last decade, most notably with the introduction of highly effective novel agents. It is now possible to aim for deep disease responses in a greater number of patients in an attempt to prolong remission duration and survival. Initially introduced in the relapsed setting, the novel agents, namely thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide, are now being increasingly incorporated into upfront treatment strategies, raising questions about the feasibility of 'retreatment' with such agents. Also, in a disease that is characterized by multiple relapses, the 'sequencing' of the different effective options is an important question. In the frontline setting, the first remission is likely to be the period during which patients will enjoy the best quality of life. Thus, the goal should be to achieve a first remission that is the longest possible by using the most effective treatment upfront. At relapse, the challenge is to select the optimal treatment for each patient while balancing efficacy and toxicity. The decision will depend on both disease- and patient-related factors. This review aimed to assess the available research data addressing 'retreatment' approaches, drug 'sequencing' and the long-term impact of upfront therapy with novel drugs.
在过去的十年中,多发性骨髓瘤的治疗方法有了很大的发展,尤其是新型有效药物的出现。现在,我们有可能在更多的患者中实现深度疾病反应,以延长缓解期和生存期。最初在复发环境中引入的新型药物,即沙利度胺、硼替佐米和来那度胺,现在越来越多地被纳入初始治疗策略,这引发了关于使用这些药物进行“再次治疗”的可行性的问题。此外,在一种以多次复发为特征的疾病中,不同有效选择的“排序”是一个重要问题。在一线治疗环境中,第一次缓解很可能是患者享受最佳生活质量的时期。因此,目标应该是通过在初始阶段使用最有效的治疗方法来实现尽可能长的第一次缓解。在复发时,选择每个患者的最佳治疗方法是一项挑战,同时需要平衡疗效和毒性。这一决策将取决于疾病和患者相关因素。本综述旨在评估现有研究数据,这些数据涉及“再次治疗”方法、药物“排序”以及新型药物初始治疗的长期影响。