• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于症状的 MELD 例外的区域差异:对器官短缺的反应?

Regional variability in symptom-based MELD exceptions: a response to organ shortage?

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2353-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03738.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03738.x
PMID:22029544
Abstract

MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) exception awards affect the liver allocation process. Award rates of specific nonhepatocellular carcinoma exceptions, termed symptom-based exceptions (SBE), differ across UNOS regions. We aimed to characterize the regional variability in SBE awards and examine predictive factors for receiving a SBE in the MELD era. The OPTN liver transplant and waiting list dataset was analyzed for waiting list registrants during the MELD allocation on February 27, 2002, until November 22, 2006. Competing risks proportional hazards regression analysis was used to examine predictors for receiving a SBE in 39 169 registrants. The hazard ratios for receiving a SBE differed significantly across regions when adjusted for multiple variables including age, gender, ethnicity, physiologic MELD score, blood group, functional status, etiology of liver disease, insurer and education level. Utilization of SBE is highly significantly variable across UNOS regions, and does not correlate with organ availability as estimated by the regional mean physiologic MELD score at transplantation. Patients with Medicaid as their primary payer have a lower likelihood of receiving a SBE award, while patients with cryptogenic/NASH cirrhosis or cholestatic liver disease have a higher likelihood of receiving a SBE. Reasons for these regional and demographic disparities deserve further investigation.

摘要

MELD(终末期肝病模型)例外授予会影响肝脏分配过程。特定非肝细胞癌例外(称为基于症状的例外,SBE)的授予率在 UNOS 区域之间存在差异。我们旨在描述 SBE 授予的区域差异,并在 MELD 时代检查获得 SBE 的预测因素。分析了 OPTN 肝移植和等候名单数据集,该数据集包括 2002 年 2 月 27 日 MELD 分配期间至 2006 年 11 月 22 日等候名单登记人员。使用竞争风险比例风险回归分析来检查 39169 名登记人员获得 SBE 的预测因素。在调整了多个变量(包括年龄、性别、种族、生理 MELD 评分、血型、功能状态、肝病病因、保险和教育水平)后,获得 SBE 的风险比在不同区域之间存在显著差异。SBE 的利用在 UNOS 区域之间存在显著差异,与根据移植时区域平均生理 MELD 评分估计的器官可用性无关。以医疗补助为主要支付者的患者获得 SBE 授予的可能性较低,而患有隐源性/NASH 肝硬化或胆汁淤积性肝病的患者获得 SBE 的可能性较高。这些区域和人口差异的原因值得进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Regional variability in symptom-based MELD exceptions: a response to organ shortage?基于症状的 MELD 例外的区域差异:对器官短缺的反应?
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2353-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03738.x.
2
Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分30分分配政策对意大利肝移植结局的影响。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list.一种在共同的肝移植等待名单上为肝癌患者和非肝癌患者分配公平性的方法。
J Hepatol. 2014 Feb;60(2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
Higher Mortality in registrants with sudden model for end-stage liver disease increase: Disadvantaged by the current allocation policy.终末期肝病模型突然增加的登记患者中死亡率更高:受当前分配政策不利影响。
Liver Transpl. 2015 May;21(5):683-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24102. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Model for end-stage liver disease exceptions in the context of the French model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system.终末期肝病模型在法国终末期肝病评分为基础的肝脏分配系统中的例外情况。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1137-51. doi: 10.1002/lt.22363.
8
MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes.MELD 例外和候补名单结果的比例。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2362-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03735.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
9
Liver transplantation in the MELD era--analysis of the OPTN/UNOS registry.终末期肝病模型(MELD)时代的肝移植——器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)/美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处分析
Clin Transpl. 2012:41-65.
10
Liver Transplantation in France.法国的肝脏移植。
Liver Transpl. 2019 May;25(5):763-770. doi: 10.1002/lt.25419. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of nonstandardized model for end-stage liver disease score exceptions with waitlist mortality in adult liver transplant candidates.成人肝移植候选者中终末期肝病评分异常的非标准化模型与等待名单死亡率的关联。
Am J Transplant. 2025 Feb;25(2):385-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.028. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.美国器官移植获取机会不公平的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 12;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01616-x.
3
HOPE in action: A prospective multicenter pilot study of liver transplantation from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV.
实践中的希望:一项关于从HIV供体到HIV受体肝移植的前瞻性多中心试点研究。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22(3):853-864. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16886. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Evaluating twenty-years of follow-up after orthotopic liver transplantation, best practice for donor-recipient matching: What can we learn from the past era?评估原位肝移植术后20年的随访情况,供体-受体匹配的最佳实践:我们能从过去的时代中学到什么?
World J Transplant. 2016 Sep 24;6(3):599-607. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.599.
5
Strategies to optimize the use of marginal donors in liver transplantation.优化边缘供体在肝移植中使用的策略。
World J Hepatol. 2015 Nov 18;7(26):2636-47. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i26.2636.
6
Liver Transplantation for Cholestatic Liver Diseases in Adults.成人胆汁淤积性肝病的肝移植
Clin Liver Dis. 2016 Feb;20(1):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
United Network for Organ Sharing regional variations in appeal denial rates with non-standard Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions: support for a national review board.器官共享联合网络中终末期肝病/小儿终末期肝病非标准模型的上诉驳回率的地区差异:对全国审查委员会的支持
Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun;29(6):513-22. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12544. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Model for End-stage Liver Disease.终末期肝病模型
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013 Mar;3(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 1.