Dewsbury and District Hospital, UK.
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):843-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
Missed compartment syndrome can have devastating long-term impact on a patient's function. Femoral fracture has been reported in 52-58% of acute thigh compartment syndromes in the existing literature. Time to diagnosis of compartment syndrome is cited as a key determinant of outcome. Use of femoral nerve blocks in splinting of femoral fractures may mask signs of early compartment syndrome. We present the attitudes of emergency department and orthopaedic staff in NHS trusts in England with regard to this issue.
Survey of all 171 acute hospitals in the United Kingdom accepting trauma admissions. On-call middle grade doctors in emergency and orthopaedic department completed a telephone survey into departmental protocol and their experience of femoral nerve blocks for lower limb fractures.
Middle grades from all 171 trusts completed the survey (100% response rate). 54 emergency departments (30.8%) had a protocol for the use of femoral nerve blocks. Middle grades in the ED reported using a nerve block routinely in 95 hospitals (54%) with 63 using a long-acting and 32 a short-acting agent. Of those that did not 70% (n=53) felt they were unnecessary, 21% (n=16) were not confident in the technique and 9% (n=7) had worries over compartment syndrome. 68% would be worried about compartment syndrome in high-energy injuries. Orthopaedic departmental protocols for nerve block use were reported in 16 trusts (9%). 45 orthopaedic middle grades (26%) indicated that they would use them routinely with 17 using long-acting and 28 using short-acting agents. 59.5% (n=75) of orthopaedic middle grades felt nerve blocks were unnecessary, whilst 22% (n=28) had worries about compartment syndrome and 18% (n=23) were not confident with the technique. 77% orthopaedic middle grades would be more worried about compartment syndrome in high energy injuries.
Femoral nerve block is an under-utilised, effective mode of analgesia following femoral fractures. There is a low risk of associated compartment syndrome, but clinicians should be especially vigilant in high-energy injuries. We recommend that all acute trusts receiving trauma should have a protocol for the use of femoral nerve blocks agreed by the emergency and orthopaedic departments.
错过间隔综合征可能对患者的功能产生毁灭性的长期影响。在现有的文献中,股骨干骨折在急性大腿间隔综合征中占 52-58%。间隔综合征的诊断时间被认为是结果的关键决定因素。在股骨干骨折的固定中使用股神经阻滞可能会掩盖早期间隔综合征的迹象。我们介绍了英国国民保健制度信托机构中急诊和骨科工作人员对此问题的态度。
对英国所有 171 家接受创伤入院的急症医院进行调查。急诊和骨科部门的中级医生完成了一项电话调查,了解部门的方案以及他们在下肢骨折中使用股神经阻滞的经验。
来自所有 171 个信托基金的中级医生完成了调查(100%的回复率)。54 个急诊科(30.8%)有使用股神经阻滞的方案。急诊室的中级医生报告说,95 家医院(54%)常规使用神经阻滞,其中 63 家使用长效剂,32 家使用短效剂。在没有使用神经阻滞的医院中,70%(n=53)认为它们是不必要的,21%(n=16)对技术没有信心,9%(n=7)对间隔综合征感到担忧。68%的人会对高能损伤的间隔综合征感到担忧。报告了 16 个信托基金(9%)的神经阻滞使用骨科部门方案。16 名骨科中级医生(26%)表示他们会常规使用,其中 17 名使用长效剂,28 名使用短效剂。59.5%(n=75)的骨科中级医生认为神经阻滞是不必要的,而 22%(n=28)对间隔综合征感到担忧,18%(n=23)对技术没有信心。77%的骨科中级医生会对高能损伤的间隔综合征更加担忧。
股神经阻滞是股骨干骨折后一种使用不充分但有效的镇痛方式。相关间隔综合征的风险较低,但临床医生在高能损伤时应特别警惕。我们建议所有接收创伤的急症信托基金都应制定一项由急诊和骨科部门共同商定的股神经阻滞使用方案。