Centre For Forensic Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Apr 10;217(1-3):5-18. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.018. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
This paper reports a comparison of the effectiveness and practicality of using different multi-metal deposition processes for finger mark development. The work investigates whether modifications can be made to improve the performance of the existing process published by Schnetz. Secondly, we compare the ability of different multi-metal deposition processes to develop finger marks on a range of surfaces with that of other currently used development processes. All published multi-metal deposition processes utilise an initial stage of colloidal gold deposition followed by enhancement of the marks with using a physical developer. All possible combinations of colloidal gold and physical developer stages were tested. The method proposed by Schnetz was shown to be the most effective process, however a modification which reduced the pH of the enhancement solution was revealed to provide the best combination of effectiveness and practicality. In trials comparing the modified formulation with vacuum metal deposition, superglue and powder suspensions on surfaces which typically give low finger mark yields (cling film, plasticised vinyl, leather and masking tape), the modified method produced significantly better results over existing processes for cling film and plasticised vinyl. The modified formulation was found to be ineffective on both masking tape and leather. It is recommended that further tests be carried out on the modified multi-metal deposition formulation to establish whether it could be introduced for operational work on cling film material in particular.
本文报告了比较使用不同多金属沉积工艺开发指纹的效果和实用性的研究结果。该工作研究了是否可以对 Schnetz 发表的现有工艺进行改进以提高其性能。其次,我们比较了不同多金属沉积工艺在一系列表面上开发指纹的能力,以及与其他当前使用的开发工艺的比较。所有已发表的多金属沉积工艺都利用胶体金沉积的初始阶段,然后使用物理显影剂增强标记。测试了胶体金和物理显影阶段的所有可能组合。Schnetz 提出的方法被证明是最有效的工艺,但降低增强溶液 pH 值的改进被证明是在效果和实用性之间提供了最佳组合。在比较修改后的配方与真空金属沉积、超级胶水和粉末悬浮液在通常指纹产量较低的表面(保鲜膜、塑化乙烯基、皮革和遮蔽胶带)的试验中,修改后的方法在保鲜膜和塑化乙烯基上的效果明显优于现有工艺。在遮蔽胶带和皮革上,修改后的配方均无效。建议对修改后的多金属沉积配方进行进一步测试,以确定是否可以将其引入特别是在保鲜膜材料上的操作工作中。