South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):299-303. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0884. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
The widespread view that Archaeopteryx was a primitive (basal) bird has been recently challenged by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis that placed Archaeopteryx with deinonychosaurian theropods. The new phylogeny suggested that typical bird flight (powered by the front limbs only) either evolved at least twice, or was lost/modified in some deinonychosaurs. However, this parsimony-based result was acknowledged to be weakly supported. Maximum-likelihood and related Bayesian methods applied to the same dataset yield a different and more orthodox result: Archaeopteryx is restored as a basal bird with bootstrap frequency of 73 per cent and posterior probability of 1. These results are consistent with a single origin of typical (forelimb-powered) bird flight. The Archaeopteryx-deinonychosaur clade retrieved by parsimony is supported by more characters (which are on average more homoplasious), whereas the Archaeopteryx-bird clade retrieved by likelihood-based methods is supported by fewer characters (but on average less homoplasious). Both positions for Archaeopteryx remain plausible, highlighting the hazy boundary between birds and advanced theropods. These results also suggest that likelihood-based methods (in addition to parsimony) can be useful in morphological phylogenetics.
普遍认为始祖鸟是一种原始(基础)鸟类,但最近的一项综合系统发育分析将始祖鸟与驰龙类兽脚亚目恐龙放在一起,这一观点受到了挑战。新的系统发育表明,典型的鸟类飞行(仅由前肢提供动力)要么至少进化了两次,要么在某些驰龙类中失去/改变了。然而,这种基于简约法的结果被认为支持力较弱。同样的数据集中应用最大似然法和相关贝叶斯方法得到了不同且更传统的结果:始祖鸟被恢复为基础鸟类,支持率为 73%,后验概率为 1。这些结果与典型(前肢动力)鸟类飞行的单一起源一致。简约法中检索到的始祖鸟-驰龙类分支由更多的特征(平均更同形)支持,而基于似然法检索到的始祖鸟-鸟类分支由较少的特征(但平均同形度较低)支持。始祖鸟的这两种位置仍然是合理的,突出了鸟类和先进的兽脚亚目之间的模糊界限。这些结果还表明,基于似然法(除了简约法)在形态系统发育学中也很有用。