Department of 1Rehabilitation Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.
Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):e6-e15. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182280299.
Several studies have evaluated the effects of different stimulus and recording parameters on the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP); however, it is difficult to directly compare these studies as they have all used different recording methods, different sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle contraction/electromyography monitoring methods, and different stimulus parameters.
: This study made a direct comparison of the cVEMP in response to air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) stimuli in the same subjects, using the same stimulus/recording/electromyography monitoring methods.
We found that the input/output (I/O) functions were more linear in response to AC stimuli, whereas cVEMPs in response to BC stimuli began to saturate at the highest level. In addition, cVEMP threshold was obtained at a lower stimulus level (i.e., at a lower sensation level) in response to BC stimuli as compared with AC stimuli, and cVEMPs in response to BC stimuli were larger than cVEMPs in response to AC stimuli, which is in agreement with what has been found in previous studies. In addition, this was one of the few studies to evaluate the repeatability of the cVEMP in response to BC stimuli. Interestingly, we found that cVEMP latency in response to BC stimuli was, in most cases, less variable than cVEMP latency obtained in response to AC stimuli, whereas the reverse was true for cVEMP amplitude. We also found that BC masking presented to the forehead affected response amplitude of the AC cVEMP regardless of the specific SCM muscle contraction/toneburst presentation condition. In addition, we found that the ratio of amplitude reduction was greater in the binaural stimulation/bilateral SCM muscle contraction condition as compared with the monaural stimulation/bilateral SCM muscle contraction condition.
The present experiment provided a direct comparison of the cVEMP in response to AC versus BC 500 Hz short-duration toneburst stimuli in the same subjects. The results of the present experiment also provide insight into the laterality of the cVEMP response and reveal that the cVEMP may not be completely ipsilateral (i.e., there may be a form of bilateral interaction that occurs when both sides are stimulated simultaneously). Last, the results indicate that BC stimuli likely activates the saccule as well as the utricle, given that AC VEMPs can be masked by the administration of BC masking noise presented to the midline.
已有多项研究评估了不同刺激和记录参数对颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)的影响;然而,由于这些研究采用的记录方法、胸锁乳突肌(SCM)收缩/肌电图监测方法以及刺激参数均不相同,因此很难直接进行比较。
本研究在同一受试者中直接比较了空气传导(AC)和骨传导(BC)刺激引起的 cVEMP,使用相同的刺激/记录/肌电图监测方法。
我们发现,AC 刺激引起的 I/O 函数更线性,而 BC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 则在最高水平开始饱和。此外,与 AC 刺激相比,BC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 阈值在较低的刺激水平(即较低的感觉水平)下获得,BC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 大于 AC 刺激引起的 cVEMP,这与之前的研究结果一致。此外,这是为数不多的评估 BC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 重复性的研究之一。有趣的是,我们发现,在大多数情况下,BC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 潜伏期比 AC 刺激引起的 cVEMP 潜伏期变化更小,而 cVEMP 幅度则相反。我们还发现,BC 掩蔽作用无论 SCM 肌肉收缩/声爆发呈现条件如何,均会影响 AC cVEMP 的反应幅度。此外,我们发现,与单耳刺激/双侧 SCM 肌肉收缩条件相比,双耳刺激/双侧 SCM 肌肉收缩条件下的幅度降低率更大。
本实验在同一受试者中直接比较了 AC 与 BC 500 Hz 短时长声爆发刺激引起的 cVEMP。本实验的结果还深入了解了 cVEMP 反应的偏侧性,并揭示 cVEMP 可能不完全是同侧的(即,当两侧同时受到刺激时,可能会发生某种形式的双侧相互作用)。最后,结果表明,由于可以通过向中线施加 BC 掩蔽噪声来掩蔽 AC VEMP,因此 BC 刺激可能会激活球囊和椭圆囊。