• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究范围:与澳大利亚最近的研究相比,心理健康消费者对研究的重点。

SCOPE for Research: mental health consumers' priorities for research compared with recent research in Australia.

机构信息

Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Level 1, Ian Potter House, Australian National University, Corner of Gordon and Marcus Clarke Streets, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia. Michelle.Banfi

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1078-85. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.624084. Epub 2011 Oct 29.

DOI:10.3109/00048674.2011.624084
PMID:22034831
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify consumer priorities for research on depression and bipolar disorder in Australia.

METHOD

Australian consumers with personal experience of depression or bipolar disorder were surveyed online about research priorities for their condition using a questionnaire developed from an earlier qualitative phase of the SCOPE for Research project. Participants were asked to rate the importance of a number of broad research areas, specific research topics, target groups and settings in which to conduct research. These ratings were then compared to the content of relevant Australian research published between 1997 and 2006.

RESULTS

Consumers rated research into the management and treatment of depression and bipolar disorder of highest priority. Further, consumers rated those at risk of a mood disorder as the most important target groups for research and prioritized research conducted in health settings such as community mental health services ahead of research in other settings. There was some concordance between consumers' ratings of the broad topic areas and settings in which to conduct research and the amount of published research on these topic areas and settings. However, there was little published research on the highest ranked consumer-rated specific topics and target groups for research.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there were substantial differences between the priorities of consumers and the recent research output, suggesting gaps in the Australian research base on mood disorders. The results of this study should be used to inform future research to ensure that it is guided by the priorities of the ultimate beneficiaries of the research, mental health consumers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定澳大利亚消费者对抑郁症和双相情感障碍研究的优先事项。

方法

通过问卷调查,对有抑郁症或双相情感障碍个人经历的澳大利亚消费者进行在线调查,了解他们对自身疾病的研究优先事项。该问卷是基于 SCOPE for Research 项目的早期定性阶段开发的。参与者被要求对一系列广泛的研究领域、特定的研究主题、目标群体和研究开展地点的重要性进行评分。然后,将这些评分与 1997 年至 2006 年间发表的澳大利亚相关研究的内容进行比较。

结果

消费者将抑郁症和双相情感障碍的管理和治疗研究评为优先级最高的研究。此外,消费者将处于情绪障碍风险中的人群评为最重要的研究目标群体,并优先考虑在社区心理健康服务等卫生环境中开展研究,而不是在其他环境中开展研究。消费者对广泛的研究主题领域和开展研究的地点的评分与这些主题领域和地点的已发表研究数量之间存在一定的一致性。然而,在消费者评分最高的特定研究主题和目标群体方面,发表的研究却很少。

结论

总体而言,消费者的优先事项与最近的研究成果之间存在很大差异,这表明澳大利亚在情绪障碍研究方面存在差距。本研究的结果应被用于指导未来的研究,以确保研究由研究的最终受益者,即心理健康消费者来指导。

相似文献

1
SCOPE for Research: mental health consumers' priorities for research compared with recent research in Australia.研究范围:与澳大利亚最近的研究相比,心理健康消费者对研究的重点。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1078-85. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.624084. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
2
Australian mental health consumers' priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project.澳大利亚精神健康消费者的研究优先事项:研究项目“研究范围(SCOPE)”的定性研究结果
Health Expect. 2014 Jun;17(3):365-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00763.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
4
Research priorities for parenting and child health: a Delphi study.育儿与儿童健康的研究重点:一项德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jul;59(2):129-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04278.x.
5
Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula.向消费者学习:一项关于澳大利亚心理健康消费者对以康复为导向课程的优先事项的电子德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):586-597. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12518. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Retrospective bibliometric review of rural health research: Australia's contribution and other trends.农村卫生研究的回顾性文献计量学综述:澳大利亚的贡献及其他趋势
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Oct-Dec;7(4):767. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Mental health consumers' perceptions of receiving recovery-focused services.心理健康服务使用者对接受以康复为重点的服务的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):654-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01070.x.
8
Research priorities in mental health, Part 2: an evaluationof the current research effort against stakeholders' priorities.精神卫生研究重点,第2部分:对照利益相关方的重点对当前研究工作的评估
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;36(3):327-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.01024.x.
9
Systematic overview of rural health research in Australia published in the serial literature.发表在系列文献中的澳大利亚农村卫生研究系统综述。
Aust J Rural Health. 2000 Oct;8(5):286-93.
10
Setting stroke research priorities: The consumer perspective.确定中风研究重点:消费者视角
J Vasc Nurs. 2010 Dec;28(4):121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2010.09.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.保持议程的时效性:澳大利亚生活体验心理健康研究重点的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138101.
2
Consumer Perspectives on Anxiety Management in Australian General Practice.消费者对澳大利亚全科医学中焦虑管理的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095706.
3
Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study.
虚拟世界咖啡馆方法在确定精神健康研究重点中的应用:方法学案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 28;19(1):291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010291.
4
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
5
Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.患者和公众参与(PPI)在定性心理健康研究协作数据分析中的最佳实践框架:方法学的发展和完善。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1794-8.
6
Two methods for engaging with the community in setting priorities for child health research: who engages?让社区参与确定儿童健康研究重点的两种方法:谁来参与?
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125969. eCollection 2015.