Suppr超能文献

经旁正中入路与正中入路插入腹膜透析导管对持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者的影响。

The effects of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using paramedian versus midline approach on CAPD patients.

作者信息

Kanokkantapong Chavasak, Leeaphorn Napat, Kanjanabuch Talerngsak

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Maharat Nakhonratchasima Hospital, Nakhonratchasima, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S52-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Types of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter design and catheter insertion techniques have been shown to affect catheter-associated infection, catheter survival, as well as, overall patient survival. Thus far, there have been no studies demonstrating a difference in long term outcome between two insertion techniques used for PD placement, including midline and paramedian incisions. The present study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes among CAPD patients who had bedside PD catheter insertion through midline incision vs. paramedian incision in terms of early post-operative complications and long term outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a retrospective study. All CAPD patients who received treatments at Maharat Nakhonratchasima Hospital during the year 2008-2010 were included in the present study. Age, sex, co-morbid diseases, laboratory results obtained prior to dialysis, early post-operative complications, and late post-operative complications were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients were identified. Of these, 43 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records. The remaining 349 cases were collected for analysis, 90 cases having paramedian incision and 259 cases having midline incision. The average age was 51.7 years old, and 52% were male. The baseline characteristics and patient parameters were similar in both approaches. The paramedian group was found to have lesser early post-operative complications (7.78%) when compared to the midline group (18.82%) (p = 0.02). Moreover, the long term outcomes were shown to be greater in paramedian approach when compared to the midline group in terms of PD catheter survival (985.5 vs. 698.1 days, p = 0.048) and overall patient survival (915.4 vs. 700.6 days, p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in peritonitis-free survival (848.7 vs. 824.3 days, p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Comparing PD catheter insertion using paramedian incision with midline incision, paramedian incision was associated with less early post operative complications, more prolonged PD catheter survival and better overall patient survival. Therefore, paramedian incision should be recommended as the preferred method for PD catheter insertion.

摘要

目的

已证实腹膜透析(PD)导管的设计类型和导管插入技术会影响导管相关感染、导管存活以及患者的总体存活情况。到目前为止,尚无研究表明用于PD置管的两种插入技术(包括中线切口和旁正中切口)在长期预后方面存在差异。本研究旨在比较通过中线切口与旁正中切口进行床边PD导管插入的持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者在术后早期并发症和长期预后方面的临床结果。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究。本研究纳入了2008年至2010年期间在呵叻玛哈拉吉医院接受治疗的所有CAPD患者。记录了患者的年龄、性别、合并疾病、透析前的实验室检查结果、术后早期并发症和术后晚期并发症。

结果

共确定了392例患者。其中,43例因病历不完整被排除。其余349例病例被收集用于分析,90例采用旁正中切口,259例采用中线切口。平均年龄为51.7岁,男性占52%。两种方法的基线特征和患者参数相似。与中线组(18.82%)相比,旁正中组术后早期并发症较少(7.78%)(p = 0.02)。此外,在PD导管存活时间(985.5天对698.1天,p = 0.048)和患者总体存活时间(915.4天对700.6天,p = 0.01)方面,旁正中入路的长期预后优于中线组。然而,在无腹膜炎存活时间方面无显著差异(848.7天对824.3天,p = 0.93)。

结论

比较旁正中切口与中线切口进行PD导管插入,旁正中切口术后早期并发症较少,PD导管存活时间更长,患者总体存活情况更好。因此,应推荐旁正中切口作为PD导管插入的首选方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验