Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Biology Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):228-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01778.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
Shrubs and trees are assumed less likely to lose genetic variation in response to habitat fragmentation because they have certain life-history characteristics such as long lifespans and extensive pollen flow. To test this assumption, we conducted a meta-analysis with data on 97 woody plant species derived from 98 studies of habitat fragmentation. We measured the weighted response of four different measures of population-level genetic diversity to habitat fragmentation with Hedge's d and Spearman rank correlation. We tested whether the genetic response to habitat fragmentation was mediated by life-history traits (longevity, pollination mode, and seed dispersal vector) and study characteristics (genetic marker and plant material used). For both tests of effect size habitat fragmentation was associated with a substantial decrease in expected heterozygosity, number of alleles, and percentage of polymorphic loci, whereas the population inbreeding coefficient was not associated with these measures. The largest proportion of variation among effect sizes was explained by pollination mechanism and by the age of the tissue (progeny or adult) that was genotyped. Our primary finding was that wind-pollinated trees and shrubs appeared to be as likely to lose genetic variation as insect-pollinated species, indicating that severe habitat fragmentation may lead to pollen limitation and limited gene flow. In comparison with results of previous meta-analyses on mainly herbaceous species, we found trees and shrubs were as likely to have negative genetic responses to habitat fragmentation as herbaceous species. We also found that the genetic variation in offspring was generally less than that of adult trees, which is evidence of a genetic extinction debt and probably reflects the genetic diversity of the historical, less-fragmented landscape.
灌木和乔木被认为不太可能因生境破碎化而失去遗传变异,因为它们具有某些生活史特征,如长寿命和广泛的花粉流。为了检验这一假设,我们对来自 98 项生境破碎化研究的 97 种木本植物物种的数据进行了荟萃分析。我们用 Hedge 的 d 和 Spearman 秩相关系数来衡量种群水平遗传多样性的四个不同指标的加权响应。我们检验了对生境破碎化的遗传反应是否受到生活史特征(寿命、授粉模式和种子扩散媒介)和研究特征(遗传标记和使用的植物材料)的影响。对于这两种效应大小的检验,生境破碎化与预期杂合度、等位基因数和多态性位点百分比的显著减少有关,而种群内婚系数与这些指标无关。效应大小之间的变异最大比例由授粉机制和被基因分型的组织(后代或成年)的年龄来解释。我们的主要发现是,风媒传粉的树木和灌木似乎与虫媒传粉物种一样容易失去遗传变异,这表明严重的生境破碎化可能导致花粉限制和有限的基因流。与主要针对草本物种的先前荟萃分析的结果相比,我们发现树木和灌木对生境破碎化的遗传反应与草本物种一样可能是负面的。我们还发现,后代的遗传变异通常小于成年树木的遗传变异,这是遗传灭绝债务的证据,可能反映了历史上、破碎化程度较低的景观的遗传多样性。