Suppr超能文献

[胰腺肿瘤的内镜超声诊断]

[Endosonographic diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].

作者信息

Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C, Feuerbach S, Siewert J R, Classen M

机构信息

II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1990 Sep 7;115(36):1339-47. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065162.

Abstract

140 patients (72 men, 68 women; mean age 57 [26-83] years) with suspected pancreatic tumours were investigated by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and also by conventional ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The EUS scans were performed with an echo-endoscope in the descending part of the duodenum (for the head of the pancreas) or in the stomach (for the body and tail). The definitive diagnosis or exclusion of a pancreatic tumour (malignant n = 85, benign n = 4, inflammatory n = 23, no tumour n = 28) was made at operation (n = 63), by needle biopsy (n = 35), at necropsy (n = 4) or by clinical follow up (n = 38, mean 10.5 months). The sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic ultrasound (99% and 100%) were superior to the results given by conventional ultrasound scans (71% and 39%), CT (82% and 46%) and ERCP (89% and 64%). This was also true of small tumours of 3 cm or less (EUS 100%, conventional ultrasound 57%, CT 68% and ERCP 89%). However, the differential diagnosis between malignant and inflammatory masses in the pancreas was not feasible by endoscopic ultrasound, either prospectively (detection rate 69%) or by comparative analyses of echo structure. Endoscopic ultrasound appears to be a valuable aid to the diagnosis or exclusion of pancreatic tumours. When conventional ultrasound and CT give negative or doubtful results it can be used in conjunction with or instead of ERCP to confirm the diagnosis.

摘要

140例疑似胰腺肿瘤患者(72例男性,68例女性;平均年龄57岁[26 - 83岁])接受了内镜超声检查(EUS),同时还接受了传统超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查。EUS扫描是通过超声内镜在十二指肠降部(针对胰头)或胃内(针对胰体和胰尾)进行的。胰腺肿瘤的最终诊断或排除(恶性85例,良性4例,炎症性23例,无肿瘤28例)通过手术(63例)、针吸活检(35例)、尸检(4例)或临床随访(38例,平均10.5个月)确定。内镜超声的敏感性和特异性(分别为99%和100%)优于传统超声扫描(71%和39%)、CT(82%和46%)以及ERCP(89%和64%)。对于3厘米及以下的小肿瘤也是如此(EUS为100%,传统超声为57%,CT为68%,ERCP为89%)。然而,无论是前瞻性地(检出率69%)还是通过回声结构的对比分析,内镜超声都无法对胰腺恶性肿块和炎症性肿块进行鉴别诊断。内镜超声似乎是诊断或排除胰腺肿瘤的一种有价值的辅助手段。当传统超声和CT结果为阴性或可疑时,它可与ERCP联合使用或替代ERCP来确诊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验