Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pan Am Clinic/University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3M 3E4, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1953-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00488.
The primary objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and quality-of-life indices and rates of revision surgery in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty.
Eighty-six patients consented and were randomly assigned intraoperatively to one of two study groups, and sixty-eight of them completed the study. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index. Secondary outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder assessment form and a count of revisions required in each group. Outcome measures were completed preoperatively and at three, six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months after surgery.
WORC and ASES scores improved significantly in each group over time (p < 0.001). There were no differences in WORC or ASES scores between the groups that had arthroscopic cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at any time point. There were no differences in scores on the basis of acromion type, nor were any interaction effects identified between group and acromion type. Four participants (9%) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone, one with a Type-2 and three with a Type-3 acromion, required additional surgery by the twenty-four-month time point. The number of patients who required additional surgery was greater (p = 0.05) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone than in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair and acromioplasty.
Our findings are consistent with previous research reports in which there was no difference in functional and quality-of-life indices for patients who had rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty. The higher reoperation rate was found in the group without acromioplasty. Further study that includes follow-up imaging and patient-reported outcomes over a greater follow-up period is needed.
本前瞻性随机对照试验的主要目的是比较肩峰成形术与不进行肩峰成形术的关节镜下肩袖修复术的功能和生活质量指数以及翻修手术率。
86 名患者同意并在术中随机分为两组,其中 68 名完成了研究。主要结局指标是 Western Ontario Rotator Cuff(WORC)指数。次要结局指标包括美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)肩关节评估表和每组需要的翻修次数。在术前和术后 3、6、12、18 和 24 个月进行评估。
两组患者的 WORC 和 ASES 评分均随时间显著改善(p<0.001)。在任何时间点,进行关节镜肩袖修复术伴或不伴肩峰成形术的两组之间的 WORC 或 ASES 评分均无差异。肩峰类型无差异,组与肩峰类型之间也未发现交互作用。单独进行关节镜肩袖修复的四例患者(9%),两例为 2 型肩峰,三例为 3 型肩峰,在 24 个月时需要额外手术。单独进行关节镜肩袖修复的组中需要额外手术的患者数量较多(p=0.05)。
我们的研究结果与之前的研究报告一致,即肩袖修复伴或不伴肩峰成形术的患者在功能和生活质量指数方面无差异。不进行肩峰成形术的组中翻修率较高。需要进一步研究,包括更大随访期内的影像学随访和患者报告的结局。