• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[精神障碍患者的预立医疗指示。范围、有效性前提及临床实施]

[Advance directives in patients with mental disorders. Scope, prerequisites for validity, and clinical implementation].

作者信息

Vollmann J

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2012 Jan;83(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s00115-011-3407-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-011-3407-3
PMID:22048569
Abstract

Since 1 September 2009, advance directives are regulated by law in Germany. This article discusses ethical challenges of advance directives in patients with mental disorders. Besides concrete information on the preferred medical treatment in concrete clinical situations, the mental capacity of the patient at the time of issuing the directive is essential. The "Decisional Competence Assessment Tool for Psychiatric Advance Directives" and empirical studies from the USA on advance directives in patients with mental disorders and the assessment by the treating psychiatrists of these patient directives are discussed. Ethical conclusions are drawn for handling advance directives in psychiatric practice.

摘要

自2009年9月1日起,德国法律对预立医疗指示进行规范。本文探讨了精神障碍患者预立医疗指示的伦理挑战。除了关于具体临床情况下首选医疗治疗的具体信息外,患者在发出指示时的精神能力至关重要。本文还讨论了“精神科预立医疗指示决策能力评估工具”以及美国关于精神障碍患者预立医疗指示的实证研究,以及治疗精神科医生对这些患者指示的评估。得出了在精神科实践中处理预立医疗指示的伦理结论。

相似文献

1
[Advance directives in patients with mental disorders. Scope, prerequisites for validity, and clinical implementation].[精神障碍患者的预立医疗指示。范围、有效性前提及临床实施]
Nervenarzt. 2012 Jan;83(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s00115-011-3407-3.
2
Personhood, patienthood, and clinical practice: reassessing advance directives.人格、患者身份与临床实践:重新审视预先指示
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):610-28.
3
[Terminal care in the form of sedation at the end of life. Current medical ethics recommendations and further need for discussion].[临终时以镇静方式进行的临终关怀。当前医学伦理建议及进一步的讨论需求]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):939-42. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1120-1.
4
[End-of-life decisions, powers of attorney, and advance directives].[临终决策、委托授权书和预先医疗指示]
Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):729-37; quiz 738-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2451-0.
5
Advance care planning: putting an end to the agonizing perpetuation of a pointless debate.预先护理计划:终结一场毫无意义辩论的痛苦延续。
Onkologie. 2013;36(7-8):395-6. doi: 10.1159/000354273. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Precommitment: a misguided strategy for securing death with dignity.预先承诺:一种确保尊严死的错误策略。
Tex Law Rev. 2003 Jun;81(7):1823-47.
7
Ethically Relevant Differences in Advance Directives for Psychiatric and End-of-Life Care.精神科护理与临终护理预先指示中的伦理相关差异。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):52-9. doi: 10.1177/1078390316629958.
8
Advance directives in dementia: issues of validity and effectiveness.痴呆症中的预先指示:有效性和可行性问题。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Mar;22(2):201-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990706. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
Advance Healthcare Directives: Binding or Informational Value?预先医疗指示:具有约束力还是信息价值?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Jan;29(1):98-109. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000823.
10
Respect for other selves.尊重他人。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2011 Dec;21(4):349-78. doi: 10.1353/ken.2011.0017.

引用本文的文献

1
Project DECIDE, part II: decision-making places for people with dementia in Alzheimer's disease: supporting advance decision-making by improving person-environment fit.项目 DECIDE,第二部分:阿尔茨海默病患者的决策地点:通过改善人与环境的适配度来支持预先决策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Apr 28;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00905-0.
2
[Advance directive of probands in pharmaceutical research : A medical ethics discussion].
Nervenarzt. 2018 Mar;89(3):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s00115-017-0392-1.
3
[Compulsory treatment in psychiatry: an ethical analysis of the new legal regulations for clinical practice].[精神病学中的强制治疗:对临床实践新法律法规的伦理分析]

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of preferences for end-of-life treatment after 3 years of follow-up: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study.随访3年后临终治疗偏好的稳定性:约翰·霍普金斯前驱研究
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2125-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2125.
2
[The problem of performing medical procedures without informed consent in unconscious patients].[在无意识患者中未经知情同意进行医疗程序的问题]
Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):706-15. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2444-z.
3
Effect of patients' reasons for refusing treatment on implementing psychiatric advance directives.
Nervenarzt. 2014 May;85(5):614-20. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3866-9.
4
[Compulsory treatment under legal uncertainty: part 2: consequences of legal uncertainty in clinical practice - suggestions for improvement].[法律不确定性下的强制治疗:第2部分:临床实践中法律不确定性的后果——改进建议]
Nervenarzt. 2012 Sep;83(9):1150-5. doi: 10.1007/s00115-012-3628-0.
患者拒绝治疗的原因对实施精神科预先指示的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1348-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.10.1348.
4
Competence to complete psychiatric advance directives: effects of facilitated decision making.完成精神科预先指示的能力:辅助决策的效果。
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Jun;31(3):275-89. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9064-6.
5
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示:一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.
6
Superseding psychiatric advance directives: ethical and legal considerations.取代精神科预先指示:伦理与法律考量
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):385-94.
7
[Advance refusal of treatment in case of loss of autonomy due to persistent brain disease].[因持续性脑部疾病导致自主能力丧失时对治疗的预先拒绝]
Nervenarzt. 2006 Sep;77(9):1031-2, 1034-6, 1038-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2117-8.
8
Discussing living wills. A qualitative study of a German sample of neurologists and ALS patients.讨论生前预嘱:对德国神经科医生和肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者样本的定性研究
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Oct 15;237(1-2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.05.013.
9
The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives.精神科预先指示的内容及临床效用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 May;56(5):592-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.5.592.
10
Law & psychiatry: psychiatric advance directives and the treatment of committed patients.法律与精神病学:精神病预先指示与被收治患者的治疗
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Jul;55(7):751-2, 763. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.751.