• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉意象清晰度量表西班牙语版本的一些心理测量特性。

Some psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale.

作者信息

Campos Alfredo, Pérez-Fabello María José

机构信息

Department of Basic Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):139-46. doi: 10.2466/04.08.24.PR0.109.4.139-146.

DOI:10.2466/04.08.24.PR0.109.4.139-146
PMID:22049656
Abstract

Few tests have been designed to measure auditory imagery. This study assessed the factor structure and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale (CAIS). Participants were 234 undergraduate students (M age = 19.6 yr.). Internal consistency reliability estimated by Cronbach's alpha was .82. In a principal components analysis followed by varimax orthogonal rotation, five factors were identified. Scores correlated moderately and positively with ratings on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire-2 and negatively on the auditory scale of Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery, but weakly and negatively with scores on the Measure of the Ability to Form Spatial Mental Imagery.

摘要

几乎没有设计出用于测量听觉意象的测试。本研究评估了西班牙语版听觉意象清晰度量表(CAIS)的因子结构和内部一致性。参与者为234名本科生(平均年龄 = 19.6岁)。通过克朗巴赫α系数估计的内部一致性信度为0.82。在进行主成分分析并随后进行方差最大化正交旋转后,确定了五个因子。分数与视觉意象生动性问卷 - 2的评分呈中度正相关,与贝茨心理意象问卷的听觉量表评分呈负相关,但与空间心理意象形成能力量表的分数呈弱负相关。

相似文献

1
Some psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale.听觉意象清晰度量表西班牙语版本的一些心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):139-46. doi: 10.2466/04.08.24.PR0.109.4.139-146.
2
The Spanish version of Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery.贝茨心理意象问卷的西班牙语版本。
Psychol Rep. 2005 Feb;96(1):51-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.1.51-56.
3
Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.修订版视觉表象清晰度问卷两个版本的内部一致性和结构有效性。
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Oct;113(2):454-60. doi: 10.2466/04.22.PMS.113.5.454-460.
4
Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire.西班牙语版物体-空间意象与言语问卷的因子结构
Psychol Rep. 2011 Apr;108(2):470-6. doi: 10.2466/08.22.27.PR0.108.2.470-476.
5
The Spanish version of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency reliability.《视觉意象生动性问卷》西班牙语版:因素结构与内部一致性信度
Psychol Rep. 2002 Apr;90(2):503-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.2.503.
6
Psychometric quality of a revised version Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.视觉意象生动性问卷修订版的心理测量学质量
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Jun;108(3):798-802. doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.3.798-802.
7
[Adaptation to Spanish of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Version (VVIQRV)].[视觉意象生动性问卷修订版(VVIQRV)的西班牙语改编版]
Psicothema. 2006 Nov;18(4):711-6.
8
Factor structure and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Gordon Test of Visual Imagery Control.西班牙语版戈登视觉表象控制测验的因子结构与内部一致性
Psychol Rep. 2004 Jun;94(3 Pt 1):761-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3.761-766.
9
Development of a new Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale.新听觉意象清晰度量表的编制。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):785-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.785.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire.《牙科满意度问卷》西班牙语版本的跨文化适应性、效度和心理测量特性
Community Dent Health. 2014 Mar;31(1):44-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties.意象能力评估:心理测量学特性的跨学科系统综述和质量评估。
BMC Med. 2022 May 2;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02295-3.
2
Individual differences in mental imagery in different modalities and levels of intentionality.不同模式和意向水平的心理意象的个体差异。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):29-44. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01209-7. Epub 2021 Aug 30.