• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传性结缔组织疾病中保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换的中期结果。

Midterm outcome of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in inherited connective tissue disorders.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1646-9; discussion 1649-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.090. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.090
PMID:22051261
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study determined the midterm outcome of valve-sparing aortic root replacement for patients with inherited connective tissue disorders.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2008, 94 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Sixty patients (64%), average age 33 years (range, 15 to 61 years), had inherited connective tissue disorders: Marfan syndrome, 54 (92%); Loeys-Dietz syndrome, 5 (8%); and smooth muscle α-actin (ACTA2) mutation in 1. Median preoperative sinus diameter was 52 mm (range, 42 to 76 mm), and moderate/severe aortic regurgitation was present in 14 (23%). Seven (12%, 1993 to 1999) underwent remodeling procedures, and 53 had reimplantation procedures. Cusp repair was performed in 4. Median follow-up was 55 months (range, 1 to 149 months). There were 15 patients in the early term (1993 to 2000) and 45 in the late term (2001 to 2008).

RESULTS

Four late deaths occurred (cardiac, 3; aortic, 1), with 10-year survival of 86%. Rates of freedom from aortic valve replacement at 5 and 10 years were 85% and 58% in remodeling and 96% and 58% in reimplantation. Risk factors for reoperations were postprocedure intraoperative aortic insufficiency greater than mild (p = 0.046), remodeling procedure (p = 0.016), and early term (p = 0.0002). One patient (2%) with none/trivial postprocedure aortic insufficiency required aortic valve replacement. Freedom from reoperation in patients with none/trivial postprocedure aortic insufficiency at 5 and 10 years was 100% and 67%.

CONCLUSIONS

Meticulous control of aortic insufficiency during operation would bring favorable midterm durability in valve-sparing aortic root replacement using a reimplantation technique, even in patients with inherited connective tissue disorders.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估心脏瓣膜保留型主动脉根部替换术治疗遗传性结缔组织疾病患者的中期疗效。

方法

1993 年至 2008 年,94 例行心脏瓣膜保留型主动脉根部替换术患者纳入本研究。其中 60 例(64%)患者患有遗传性结缔组织疾病,包括马凡综合征 54 例(92%)、Loeys-Dietz 综合征 5 例(8%)和平滑肌α-肌动蛋白(ACTA2)突变 1 例。术前窦管交界直径中位数为 52mm(范围 42-76mm),14 例(23%)存在中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全。7 例行主动脉根部塑形术,53 例行主动脉瓣叶重新植入术。4 例行瓣叶修复术。中位随访时间为 55 个月(范围 1-149 个月)。其中 15 例患者为早期组(1993 年至 1999 年),45 例为晚期组(2001 年至 2008 年)。

结果

共有 4 例患者术后晚期死亡(心脏源性 3 例,主动脉源性 1 例),10 年生存率为 86%。主动脉瓣再次置换的 5 年和 10 年无事件生存率在主动脉根部塑形组分别为 85%和 58%,在主动脉瓣叶重新植入组分别为 96%和 58%。再次手术的危险因素包括术后中重度主动脉瓣关闭不全(p=0.046)、主动脉根部塑形术(p=0.016)和早期组(p=0.0002)。1 例(2%)术后无/轻度主动脉瓣关闭不全患者需行主动脉瓣置换术。术后无/轻度主动脉瓣关闭不全患者的 5 年和 10 年无事件生存率分别为 100%和 67%。

结论

采用主动脉瓣叶重新植入技术行心脏瓣膜保留型主动脉根部替换术,术中精细控制主动脉瓣关闭不全可获得良好的中期效果,即使是遗传性结缔组织疾病患者也是如此。

相似文献

1
Midterm outcome of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in inherited connective tissue disorders.遗传性结缔组织疾病中保留瓣膜的主动脉根部替换的中期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1646-9; discussion 1649-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.090. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
2
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in children: intermediate-term results.儿童保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术:中期结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;12(3):415-9, discussion 419. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.255596. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
3
Aortic root replacement in children: a word of caution about valve-sparing procedures.儿童主动脉根部置换术:关于保留瓣膜手术的一句警示。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.043. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
4
Valve-sparing operation for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部瘤的保留瓣膜手术
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;58(2):76-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1186277. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
5
Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement in Marfan syndrome using the Valsalva conduit: an intercontinental multicenter study.使用瓦氏窦导管对马凡综合征患者进行保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入置换术:一项跨洲际多中心研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S769-73; discussion S785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.084.
6
Early experience with valve-sparing aortic root replacement in children.儿童保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术的早期经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Nov;80(5):1622-6; discussion 1626-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.062.
7
Valve-sparing and valve-replacing techniques for aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: Analysis of early outcome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的保留瓣膜和置换瓣膜技术:早期结果分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 May;137(5):1124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.023.
8
[Long-term outcome of aortic valve sparing procedures in connective tissue disorders].[结缔组织疾病中保留主动脉瓣手术的长期结果]
Kyobu Geka. 2009 Oct;62(11):978-81.
9
Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction in children, teenagers, and young adults.儿童、青少年和年轻成人的保留瓣膜主动脉根部重建术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Aug;94(2):587-90; discussion 590-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.12.097. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
Aortic regurgitation after valve-sparing aortic root replacement: modes of failure.主动脉瓣替换术后主动脉瓣关闭不全:失败模式。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.080. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Congenital Aortopathy: Long-term Results.先天性主动脉病变中保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:长期结果
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Nov 6;3(2):368-372. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.10.016. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Two-stage surgery for acute type B aortic dissection and aortic root aneurysm in a patient with Turner syndrome: a case report.特纳综合征患者急性B型主动脉夹层和主动脉根部瘤的两阶段手术:病例报告
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases. 2025 May 1;4(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s44215-025-00202-9.
3
Total arch replacement using frozen elephant trunk and repair of bilateral subclavian artery aneurysms in a patient with type 2 Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
在一名2型洛伊斯-迪茨综合征患者中使用带膜支架象鼻技术行全主动脉弓置换并修复双侧锁骨下动脉瘤。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Aug 11;9(4):101292. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101292. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Decision-making at initial surgery for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome: proximal or extensive repair.马凡综合征患者A型主动脉夹层初次手术时的决策:近端修复还是广泛修复。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):4951-4959. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.21.
5
Redo Aortic Root Operations in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.马方综合征患者的主动脉根部再次手术
Int J Angiol. 2018 Jun;27(2):92-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649485. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Impact of connective tissue disease on the surgical outcomes of aortic dissection in patients with cystic medial necrosis.结缔组织病对囊性中层坏死患者主动脉夹层手术结局的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov 23;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0663-8.
7
Valve-sparing aortic root surgery. CON: remodeling.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部手术。反对意见:重塑。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):82-92. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 16.
8
Overview of current surgical strategies for aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉疾病的当前手术策略概述。
Surg Today. 2016 Sep;46(9):1006-18. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1278-0. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
9
Systematic review of aortic valve preservation and repair.主动脉瓣保护和修复的系统评价。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;2(1):3-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.01.07.
10
Aortic valve sparing operations: a review.保留主动脉瓣手术:综述
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;45(4):205-12. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.4.205. Epub 2012 Aug 3.