National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, 2110 University Boulevard, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA.
Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(1):300-10. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.555.
The Conservation Effects Assessment Project was established to quantify water quality benefits of conservation practices supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). In 2004, watershed assessment studies were begun in fourteen agricultural watersheds with varying cropping systems, landscapes, climate, and water quality concerns. This paper reviews USDA Agricultural Research Service 'Benchmark' watershed studies and the challenge of identifying water quality benefits in watersheds. Study goals included modeling and field research to assess practices, and evaluation of practice placement in watersheds. Not all goals were met within five years but important lessons were learned. While practices improved water quality, problems persisted in larger watersheds. This dissociation between practice-focused and watershed-scale assessments occurred because: (1) Conservation practices were not targeted at critical sources/pathways of contaminants; (2) Sediment in streams originated more from channel and bank erosion than from soil erosion; (3) Timing lags, historical legacies, and shifting climate combined to mask effects of practice implementation; and (4) Water quality management strategies addressed single contaminants with little regard for trade-offs among contaminants. These lessons could help improve conservation strategies and set water quality goals with realistic timelines. Continued research on agricultural water quality could better integrate modeling and monitoring capabilities, and address ecosystem services.
保护效应评估项目成立的目的是量化美国农业部(USDA)支持的保护措施的水质效益。2004 年,在 14 个具有不同耕作制度、景观、气候和水质问题的农业流域开始进行流域评估研究。本文回顾了美国农业部农业研究局的“基准”流域研究以及在流域中确定水质效益的挑战。研究目标包括评估实践的建模和实地研究,以及在流域中评估实践的定位。尽管在五年内没有实现所有目标,但吸取了重要的经验教训。虽然这些措施改善了水质,但在较大的流域中仍然存在问题。这种实践重点和流域尺度评估之间的脱节是因为:(1)保护措施没有针对污染物的关键源/途径;(2)溪流中的沉积物主要来自于渠道和河岸侵蚀,而不是土壤侵蚀;(3)时间滞后、历史遗留问题和气候变化的变化掩盖了实践实施的影响;(4)水质管理策略针对单一污染物,而很少考虑污染物之间的权衡。这些经验教训可以帮助改进保护策略,并制定具有现实时间表的水质目标。对农业水质的持续研究可以更好地整合建模和监测能力,并解决生态系统服务问题。