• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of the optical intrascope, the Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator and the Danish MFA probe to predict pig carcass backfat thickness.

作者信息

Giles L R

机构信息

Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 1983 Jan;8(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(83)90030-X.

DOI:10.1016/0309-1740(83)90030-X
PMID:22055404
Abstract

Two automatic backfat measurement devices (the New Zealand Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator (FDI) and the Danish Meat Fat Automatic (MFA) probe) were compared with the Optical Intrascope (OI) as alternative devices to predict P(2) backfat thickness (65 mm from the dorsal mid-line at the level of the posterior edge of the head of the last rib) in pig carcass classification schemes. Prediction equations of P(2) backfat thickness (mm) taken on the cold carcass (cold P(2)) were developed for two operators who made independent hot carcass P(2) measurements (hot P(2)) with the O1, FDI and MFA on each of 114 carcasses. The OI and FDI were found to be of equivalent precision in predicting cold P(2) with the same operator (residual standard deviation, RSD = 1·29 and 1·30, respectively). The MFA was significantly (P < 0·05) less precise (RSD = 1·81). Between operator measurements of hot P(2) with the FDI (RSD = 1·17) had significantly (P < 0·05) less variation compared with the OI and MFA (RSD = 1·27).

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of the optical intrascope, the Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator and the Danish MFA probe to predict pig carcass backfat thickness.
Meat Sci. 1983 Jan;8(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(83)90030-X.
2
Predicting cutability of pork carcasses and hams using the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator.使用轩尼诗和庄脂肪深度指标预测猪胴体和火腿的可切割性。
Meat Sci. 1984;11(1):13-26. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(84)90014-7.
3
A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pig carcass classification and grading.用于猪胴体分类和分级的丹麦MFA、阿尔斯特探头与光学探头的比较。
Meat Sci. 1979 Apr;3(2):109-20. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(79)90013-5.
4
Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.三种光学探头预测猪肉胴体成分替代指标的评估。
J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):767-94. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2286. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
5
Prediction of the weight of lean and fat yield in bacon weight carcasses. A comparison of predictors used in commercial pig carcass classification.预测培根体重猪胴体中瘦肉和脂肪产量的重量。商业猪胴体分级中使用的预测指标比较。
Meat Sci. 1983 Jan;8(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(83)90029-3.
6
The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes.通过探头测量脂肪和肌肉厚度来估算绵羊胴体组成。
Meat Sci. 1986;16(2):113-26. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7.
7
Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
Meat Sci. 1984;10(2):131-44. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(84)90065-2.
8
Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.在阿根廷使用轩尼诗分级探头和脂肪测量仪预测猪胴体瘦肉含量。
Meat Sci. 2008 Jul;79(3):611-3. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.004. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
9
Predicting cutability of packer-trimmed pork loins.预测去骨猪里脊肉的可切割性。
Meat Sci. 1982 Dec;7(4):313-22. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(82)90059-6.
10
Comparison of ultrasonic measurement of backfat depth on live pigs and carcases with a digital recording instrument.使用数字记录仪器对生猪和屠体背膘厚度进行超声测量的比较。
Meat Sci. 1987;19(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(87)90016-7.