Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612-7211, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Nov;75(11):1476-81.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between abstracts of posters presented at the 79(th) (2002) and 80(th) (2003) Annual Session & Exhibition of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) and the published full-length articles resulting from the same studies. The abstracts for poster presentation sessions were downloaded, and basic characteristics of the abstracts and their authors were determined. A PubMed search was then performed to identify the publication of full-length articles based on those abstracts in a peer-reviewed journal. The differences between the abstract and the article were examined and categorized as major and minor differences. Differences identified included authorship, title, materials and methods, results, conclusions, and funding. Data were analyzed with both descriptive and analytic statistics. Overall, 89 percent of the abstracts had at least one variation from its corresponding article, and 65 percent and 76 percent of the abstracts had at least one major and minor variation, respectively, from its corresponding article. The most prevalent major variation was in study results, and the most prevalent minor variation was change in the number of authors. The discussion speculates on some possible reasons for these differences.
本研究旨在调查美国牙科学教育协会(ADEA)第 79 届(2002 年)和第 80 届(2003 年)年会暨展览会上展示的海报摘要与同一研究的已发表全文文章之间的差异。下载海报展示会议的摘要,并确定摘要及其作者的基本特征。然后在 PubMed 上进行搜索,以确定基于这些摘要在同行评审期刊上发表的全文文章。检查并将差异分类为主要和次要差异。确定的差异包括作者、标题、材料和方法、结果、结论和资金。使用描述性和分析性统计数据进行数据分析。总体而言,89%的摘要与其对应的文章至少有一个差异,65%和 76%的摘要与其对应的文章分别至少有一个主要和次要差异。最常见的主要差异是研究结果,最常见的次要差异是作者人数的变化。讨论推测了这些差异的一些可能原因。