Segal G H, Hart W R
Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5138.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1990 Oct;14(10):895-903. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199010000-00001.
The clinical and histologic features of cystic endocervical tunnel clusters (CETC) are not well known. Unwary pathologists have sometimes mistaken CETC for endocervical adenocarcinoma or interpreted them as "adenomatous hyperplasia." In this study, CETC were identified in 19 (5.9%) of 322 consecutive hysterectomy specimens and three (9.7%) of 31 consecutive cervical conization specimens accessioned during a 1-year period. These 22 cases were analyzed along with seven consultation cases. The 29 patients' ages ranged from 33 to 72 years (mean, 55). All but one (96.6%) were multigravida. Almost 80% of the patients had had at least three previous pregnancies. The mean gravidity and age of the hysterectomy patients with CETC were significantly greater than those without them. CETC typically were discovered incidentally during routine examination of the cervix. The clusters ranged from 0.5 to 18.8 mm (mean, 2.4 mm) in greatest dimension; they were multifocal in 82.8% of cases. CETC consisted of orderly, lobular aggregates of closely packed, dilated tubular endocervical "glands" within the superficial endocervix. The deepest clusters extended to a depth of 9.0 mm. They were commonly associated with multiple Nabothian cysts, which occasionally also penetrated deeply. The lining epithelium was a single layer of flattened or cuboidal endocervical cells. Mitotic figures and significant cytologic atypia were absent. None of the cases had intracytoplasmic CEA immunoreactivity, but in 52% focal positive CEA staining was noted along the luminal border of the endocervical cells. CETC are believed to result from subinvolution of previous episodes of physiologic hyperplasia of the endocervical mucosa, usually due to prior pregnancies. They are unrelated to cervical neoplasms and must be distinguished from adenocarcinoma and other glandular lesions of the endocervix.
宫颈管囊肿性隧道样簇(CETC)的临床和组织学特征尚不为人熟知。粗心的病理学家有时会将CETC误诊为宫颈管腺癌,或解释为“腺瘤样增生”。在本研究中,在1年期间连续送检的322例子宫切除标本中有19例(5.9%)发现了CETC,31例连续宫颈锥切标本中有3例(9.7%)发现了CETC。对这22例病例以及7例会诊病例进行了分析。29例患者年龄在33至72岁之间(平均55岁)。除1例(96.6%)外均为多产妇。几乎80%的患者既往至少有过3次妊娠。患有CETC的子宫切除患者的平均妊娠次数和年龄显著高于未患CETC的患者。CETC通常在宫颈常规检查时偶然发现。这些簇状结构最大直径为0.5至18.8毫米(平均2.4毫米);82.8%的病例为多灶性。CETC由宫颈管浅层内紧密排列、扩张的管状宫颈“腺体”有序的小叶状聚集物组成。最深的簇状结构延伸至9.0毫米深度。它们通常与多个纳博特囊肿相关,这些囊肿偶尔也会深达深部。衬里上皮为单层扁平或立方形宫颈管细胞。未见有丝分裂象和明显的细胞异型性。所有病例均无胞质内癌胚抗原(CEA)免疫反应性,但52%的病例在宫颈管细胞的腔缘可见局灶性CEA阳性染色。CETC被认为是宫颈管黏膜先前生理性增生事件复旧不全的结果,通常是由于既往妊娠所致。它们与宫颈肿瘤无关,必须与宫颈管腺癌及其他腺性病变相鉴别。