Pohlman F W, Dikeman M E, Zayas J F
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-0201, USA.
Meat Sci. 1997 Mar;45(3):329-37. doi: 10.1016/s0309-1740(96)00106-4.
A series of experiments were conducted to assess the impact of low-intensity ultrasound treatment on shear properties, color and shelflife of packaged beef muscles. For the first experiment, 15 beef semitendinosus muscles were sliced (6.4 × 2.5 × 70.2 cm) weighed, vacuum packaged, subjected to a 1.55 W/cm(2) intensity ultrasonic field for 8, 16 or 24 min then stored at 3 °C for 4 days; controls were not sonicated. Muscles were then removed from vacuum bags, weighed, cooked to 70 °C internal temperature in a convection oven and evaluated for cooking and shearing properties. For the second experiment, 14 beef semitendinosus muscles were sliced (2.5 × 5.1 × 10.2 cm), vacuum packaged and allocated to either a simultaneous ultrasound/water-bath-heating treatment or water-bath-heating treatment only. Muscles were removed from the water-bath when the water temperature reached 70 °C, removed from the vacuum bags, cooked further to an internal temperature of 70 °C in a convection oven and evaluated for instrumental shear. For the third experiment, 30 beef biceps femoris pieces (1.3 × 7.6 × 10.2 cm) were mixed together to more evenly distribute native microflora, vacuum packaged and allocated to either ultrasound (1.55 W/cm(2), 3 °C, 30 min) treatment or control (no ultrasound treatment). Vacuum-packaged muscles were stored in a retail display case (3 °C) and evaluated at 0, 5, 10, 20 and 30 days for microbial count and instrumental color (CIE L (∗)a (∗)b (∗)). Ultrasound had no effect (p > 0.05) on storage purge loss, cooking loss, or textural properties (Experiments 1 and 2). Microbial levels were initially reduced (p < 0.05) by the ultrasound treatment (0 days), but differences in microbial numbers between ultrasound-treated samples and controls disappeared (p > 0.05) during storage (Experiment 3).
进行了一系列实验,以评估低强度超声处理对包装牛肉肌肉的剪切特性、颜色和货架期的影响。在第一个实验中,将15块牛半腱肌切成片(6.4×2.5×70.2厘米),称重,真空包装,置于强度为1.55瓦/平方厘米的超声场中8、16或24分钟,然后在3℃下储存4天;对照组不进行超声处理。然后将肌肉从真空袋中取出,称重,在对流烤箱中煮至内部温度70℃,并评估其烹饪和剪切特性。在第二个实验中,将14块牛半腱肌切成片(2.5×5.1×10.2厘米),真空包装,并分配到同时进行超声/水浴加热处理或仅进行水浴加热处理。当水温达到70℃时,将肌肉从水浴中取出,从真空袋中取出,在对流烤箱中进一步煮至内部温度70℃,并评估其仪器剪切力。在第三个实验中,将30块牛股二头肌块(1.3×7.6×10.2厘米)混合在一起,以使天然微生物群更均匀地分布,真空包装,并分配到超声处理组(1.55瓦/平方厘米,3℃,30分钟)或对照组(不进行超声处理)。将真空包装的肌肉储存在零售展示柜(3℃)中,并在0、5、10、20和30天评估微生物数量和仪器颜色(CIE L()a()b(*))。超声处理对储存失重、烹饪损失或质地特性没有影响(实验1和2,p>0.05)。超声处理最初降低了微生物水平(p<0.05)(0天),但在储存期间,超声处理样品与对照之间的微生物数量差异消失(p>0.05)(实验3)。