• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响非裔美国人参与 LOOK AHEAD 试验的因素。

Factors influencing enrollment of African Americans in the Look AHEAD trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2012 Feb;9(1):80-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511427929. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1177/1740774511427929
PMID:22064686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3843916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many factors have been identified that influence the recruitment of African Americans into clinical trials; however, the influence of eligibility criteria may not be widely appreciated. We used the experience from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) trial screening process to examine the differential impact eligibility criteria had on the enrollment of African Americans compared to other volunteers.

METHODS

Look AHEAD is a large randomized clinical trial to examine whether assignment to an intensive lifestyle intervention designed to produce and maintain weight loss reduces the long-term risk of major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes. Differences in the screening, eligibility, and enrollment rates between African Americans and members of other racial/ethnic groups were examined to identify possible reasons.

RESULTS

Look AHEAD screened 28,735 individuals for enrollment, including 6226 (21.7%) who were self-identified African Americans. Of these volunteers, 12.9% of the African Americans compared to 19.3% of all other screenees ultimately enrolled (p < 0.001). African Americans no more often than others were lost to follow-up or refused to attend clinic visits to establish eligibility. Furthermore, the enrollment rates of individuals with histories of cardiovascular disease and diabetes therapy did not markedly differ between the ethnic groups. Higher prevalence of adverse levels of blood pressure, heart rate, HbA1c, and serum creatinine among African American screenees accounted for the greater proportions excluded (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to non-African Americans, African American were more often ineligible for the Look AHEAD trial due to comorbid conditions. Monitoring trial eligibility criteria for differential impact, and modifying them when appropriate, may ensure greater enrollment yields.

摘要

背景

许多因素已被确定会影响非裔美国人参与临床试验;然而,资格标准的影响可能尚未得到广泛认识。我们利用 Look AHEAD(糖尿病行动研究)试验筛选过程的经验,检查了资格标准对非裔美国人和其他志愿者入组的差异影响。

方法

Look AHEAD 是一项大型随机临床试验,旨在检查将 2 型糖尿病患者分配到旨在减肥并维持体重的强化生活方式干预中,是否可以降低其长期发生主要心血管事件的风险。检查了非裔美国人和其他种族/族裔群体之间在筛选、资格和入组率方面的差异,以确定可能的原因。

结果

Look AHEAD 对 28735 人进行了入组筛选,其中包括 6226 名(21.7%)自我认定为非裔美国人的志愿者。在这些志愿者中,12.9%的非裔美国人最终入组,而所有其他筛查者的入组率为 19.3%(p<0.001)。非裔美国人因失访或拒绝参加诊所就诊以确定资格而未入组的比例并不比其他人高。此外,有心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗史的个体的入组率在不同种族之间没有明显差异。非裔美国人筛查者中血压、心率、HbA1c 和血清肌酐不良水平的比例较高,这导致了更多的人被排除在外(均 p<0.001)。

结论

与非裔美国人相比,由于合并症,非裔美国人更常不符合 Look AHEAD 试验的入组标准。监测试验入组标准的差异影响,并在适当情况下进行修改,可能会确保更大的入组率。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing enrollment of African Americans in the Look AHEAD trial.影响非裔美国人参与 LOOK AHEAD 试验的因素。
Clin Trials. 2012 Feb;9(1):80-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511427929. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
2
Constructing common cohorts from trials with overlapping eligibility criteria: implications for comparing effect sizes between trials.从具有重叠纳入标准的试验中构建共同队列:对比较试验间效应大小的影响。
Clin Trials. 2009 Oct;6(5):416-29. doi: 10.1177/1740774509344440. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
3
Racial differences in eligibility and enrollment in a smoking cessation clinical trial.种族差异与戒烟临床试验的入选和参与。
Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):40-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021649.
4
Targeting weight loss interventions to reduce cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a machine learning-based post-hoc analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects in the Look AHEAD trial.针对降低 2 型糖尿病心血管并发症的减肥干预措施:一项基于 LOOK AHEAD 试验中异质治疗效果的机器学习事后分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Oct;5(10):808-815. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30176-6. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
Baseline characteristics of the randomised cohort from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study.来自“展望(糖尿病健康行动)”研究的随机队列的基线特征。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006 Dec;3(3):202-15. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2006.031.
6
Recruitment and enrollment of African Americans into health promoting programs: the effects of health promoting programs on cardiovascular disease risk study.招募和招收非裔美国人参加促进健康的项目:促进健康计划对心血管疾病风险研究的影响。
Ethn Health. 2020 Aug;25(6):825-834. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1458074. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial.生活方式干预对2型糖尿病患者体重及心血管危险因素的长期影响:Look AHEAD试验的四年结果
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1566-75. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.334.
8
Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes.“展望未来”(糖尿病健康行动):一项旨在预防2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病的减肥临床试验的设计与方法
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Oct;24(5):610-28. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00064-3.
9
Weight Loss Experiences of African American, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Men and Women with Type 2 Diabetes: The Look AHEAD Trial.2 型糖尿病非西班牙裔白种人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑种人男性和女性的减肥经历: LOOK AHEAD 试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Aug;27(8):1275-1284. doi: 10.1002/oby.22522.
10
The use of electronic medical records for recruitment in clinical trials: findings from the Lifestyle Intervention for Treatment of Diabetes trial.在临床试验中使用电子病历进行招募:糖尿病生活方式干预试验的结果
Trials. 2016 Oct 13;17(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1631-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the impact of ineligibility on individuals expressing interest in a trial aimed at improving daily functioning regarding perceptions of self, research and likelihood of future participation.探讨不具备参与资格对那些对旨在改善日常功能、自我认知、研究和未来参与可能性的试验表达兴趣的个体的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 27;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01464-x.
2
Impact of an 8-Year Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on an Index of Multimorbidity.八年强化生活方式干预对多种疾病指标的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2249-2256. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16672. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
Weight Loss Experiences of African American, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Men and Women with Type 2 Diabetes: The Look AHEAD Trial.2 型糖尿病非西班牙裔白种人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑种人男性和女性的减肥经历: LOOK AHEAD 试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Aug;27(8):1275-1284. doi: 10.1002/oby.22522.
4
Characteristics Associated With Participation in a Behavioral Weight Loss Randomized Control Trial in the U.S. Military.与参与美国军队行为减肥随机对照试验相关的特征
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(3-4):e120-e126. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy199.
5
The use of electronic medical records for recruitment in clinical trials: findings from the Lifestyle Intervention for Treatment of Diabetes trial.在临床试验中使用电子病历进行招募:糖尿病生活方式干预试验的结果
Trials. 2016 Oct 13;17(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1631-7.
6
Diabetic indicators are the strongest predictors for cardiovascular disease risk in African American adults.糖尿病指标是美国非裔成年人心血管疾病风险的最强预测因素。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Sep 15;6(3):129-37. eCollection 2016.
7
Recruitment of older adults with type 2 diabetes into a community-based exercise and nutrition randomised controlled trial.招募2型糖尿病老年人参加一项基于社区的运动与营养随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Sep 26;17(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1589-5.
8
The Recruitment Experience of a Randomized Clinical Trial to Aid Young Adult Smokers to Stop Smoking without Weight Gain with Interactive Technology.一项随机临床试验的招募经验:借助交互式技术帮助年轻成年吸烟者戒烟且不增重
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Apr 15;2:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.010.
9
Young Adults' Attitudes and Perceptions of Obesity and Weight Management: Implications for Treatment Development.年轻人对肥胖及体重管理的态度和认知:对治疗发展的启示
Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Mar;5(1):14-22. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0188-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The development and description of the comparison group in the Look AHEAD trial.在 LOOK AHEAD 试验中比较组的发展和描述。
Clin Trials. 2011 Jun;8(3):320-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511405858.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in diabetes mellitus among people with and without psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.有和没有精神障碍的人群中糖尿病的种族和民族差异:来自全国酒精相关情况的流行病学调查。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Mar-Apr;33(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
3
Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials.个人获益还是造福他人?决定是否参与临床试验。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):85-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392257. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
4
Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.癌症临床试验参与者的知识水平和认知理解——与知情同意程序相关的因素。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774510384516. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
5
The potential of black radio to disseminate health messages and reduce disparities.黑人社群广播在传播健康信息和减少差异方面的潜力。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A87. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
6
Poverty and racial disparities in kidney disease: the REGARDS study.贫困和肾脏疾病中的种族差异:REGARDS 研究。
Am J Nephrol. 2010;32(1):38-46. doi: 10.1159/000313883. Epub 2010 May 31.
7
Diabetes and cognitive decline: investigating the potential influence of factors related to health disparities.糖尿病与认知能力下降:探究与健康差异相关因素的潜在影响。
J Aging Health. 2010 Apr;22(3):292-306. doi: 10.1177/0898264309357445. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
8
Design, recruitment, and retention of African-American smokers in a pharmacokinetic study.在一项药代动力学研究中招募和保留非裔美国吸烟者的设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 19;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-6.
9
Recruitment, enrollment and retention of young black men for HIV prevention research: experiences from The 411 for Safe Text project.招募、纳入和留住年轻黑人男性参与 HIV 预防研究:来自“411 安全短信项目”的经验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Mar;31(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: implications of results from recall and recognition questions.识别塔斯基吉梅毒研究:回忆和识别问题结果的意义。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 16;9:468. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-468.