Chevtchik Orest, Steger Christina, Bonaros Nikolaos, Müller Ludwig C, Ruttmann Elfriede
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 Sep;20(5):593-5.
Since aortic root reoperations are challenging procedures, alternative lower-risk procedures should be considered in certain cases. Herein are presented two different approaches to high-risk root reoperations. The first patient, a 59-year-old male who had undergone root replacement 11 years previously with an Edwards Prima stentless valve, presented with severe aortic regurgitation and a heavily calcified aortic root. An open implantation of an Edwards Sapien valve was performed via an aortotomy distal to the calcified aortic root. The second patient, a 60-year-old female, underwent transapical implantation of an Edwards Sapien transcatheter valve for stenosis of the aortic valve in an aortic homograft implanted 11 years previously. The long-term durability of these implants has yet to be evaluated.
由于主动脉根部再次手术是具有挑战性的操作,在某些情况下应考虑风险较低的替代手术。本文介绍了两种针对高风险根部再次手术的不同方法。首例患者为一名59岁男性,11年前接受了Edwards Prima无支架瓣膜根部置换术,现出现严重主动脉瓣反流和主动脉根部重度钙化。通过钙化主动脉根部远端的主动脉切开术进行了Edwards Sapien瓣膜的开放植入。第二例患者为一名60岁女性,因11年前植入的主动脉同种异体移植物中主动脉瓣狭窄,接受了经心尖植入Edwards Sapien经导管瓣膜手术。这些植入物的长期耐久性尚未得到评估。