Nuwaha Fred, Babirye Juliet, Okui Olico, Ayiga Natal
Makerere University School of Public Health, P,O, Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Nov 9;4:484. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-484.
Teso sub-region of Eastern Uganda had superior indices of childhood survival during the period 1959 to 1969 compared to the national average. We analysed the reasons that could explain this situation with a view of suggesting strategies for reducing childhood mortality.
We compared the childhood mortalities and their average annual reduction rate (AARR) of Teso sub-region with those of Uganda for the period 1959 to 1969. We also compared indicators of social economic well being (such as livestock per capita and per capita intake of protein/energy). In addition data was compared on other important determinants of child survival such as level of education and rate of urbanisation.
In 1969 the infant mortality rate (IMR) for Teso was 94 per 1000 live births compared to the 120 for Uganda. Between 1959 and 1969 the AARR for IMR for Teso was 4.57% compared to 3% for Uganda. It was interesting that the AARR for Teso was higher than that that of 4.4.% required to achieve millennium development goal number four (MDG4). The rate of urbanisation and the level of education were higher in Uganda compared to Teso during the same period. Teso had a per capita ownership of cattle of 1.12 compared to Uganda's 0.44. Teso sub region had about 3 times the amount of protein and about 2 times the amount of calories compared to Uganda.
We surmise that higher ownership of cattle and growing of high protein and energy foods might have been responsible for better childhood survival in Teso compared to Uganda.
与全国平均水平相比,乌干达东部的特索次区域在1959年至1969年期间儿童存活率指标更优。我们分析了能够解释这种情况的原因,以期提出降低儿童死亡率的策略。
我们比较了1959年至1969年期间特索次区域与乌干达的儿童死亡率及其年均下降率(AARR)。我们还比较了社会经济福祉指标(如人均牲畜数量以及蛋白质/能量的人均摄入量)。此外,还比较了关于儿童生存的其他重要决定因素的数据,如教育水平和城市化率。
1969年,特索地区的婴儿死亡率(IMR)为每1000例活产94例,而乌干达为120例。1959年至1969年期间,特索地区婴儿死亡率的年均下降率为4.57%,而乌干达为3%。有趣的是,特索地区的年均下降率高于实现千年发展目标4(MDG4)所需的4.4%。同一时期,乌干达的城市化率和教育水平高于特索地区。特索地区的人均牛拥有量为1.12头,而乌干达为0.44头。与乌干达相比,特索次区域的蛋白质含量约为其三倍,热量约为其两倍。
我们推测,与乌干达相比,特索地区较高的牛拥有量以及高蛋白和高能量食物的种植可能是儿童存活率更高的原因。