• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规收集的患者数据在研究中的应用:批判性评价。

The use of routinely collected patient data for research: a critical review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Jean McFarlane Building, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health (London). 2012 Jul;16(4):448-63. doi: 10.1177/1363459311425513. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1177/1363459311425513
PMID:22071234
Abstract

Over recent years in the UK there has been growing interest in the potential for routinely collected NHS (National Health Service) patient data to be used for secondary purposes, facilitated by the potential of increasingly sophisticated electronic databases. This article is based on a critically reflective literature review which analyses the key debates pertaining to this issue. The work arose in the context of a programme of research concerning routine patient data use in neonatal care. The article includes analysis of commentary (opinion and ethical inquiry) as well as empirically derived claims. It aims to deconstruct the knowledge assumptions on which relevant research studies have been based or are proposed and it also incorporates ontological position and moral argument. Results are presented according to three predominant debates: the prevailing claim that all health research benefits civic society; the varieties of informed consent and choices open to patients regarding secondary uses of their data; and the 'rights and responsibilities' of patients when it comes to their data being used for research purposes. It examines the relevance of these themes specifically to the neonatal context and the implications for our own research, concluding that employing an alternative ethical model to the traditional professional one might be useful in order to provide a further perspective on the issue.

摘要

近年来,英国越来越关注将国民保健制度(NHS)中常规收集的患者数据用于次要目的的可能性,这得益于日益复杂的电子数据库的潜力。本文基于批判性文献回顾,分析了与该问题相关的主要争论。这项工作是在一项关于新生儿护理中常规患者数据使用的研究计划的背景下开展的。本文包括对评论(意见和伦理探究)以及经验主义主张的分析。它旨在解构相关研究工作所依据或提议的知识假设,并纳入本体论立场和道德论证。结果根据三个主要的争论呈现:普遍声称所有健康研究都使公民社会受益;患者在其数据的二次使用方面可以选择的各种知情同意和选择;以及当涉及到患者的数据用于研究目的时,他们的“权利和责任”。它特别考察了这些主题对新生儿背景的相关性,以及对我们自己研究的影响,结论是,采用传统专业伦理模式以外的替代伦理模式可能有助于为该问题提供进一步的视角。

相似文献

1
The use of routinely collected patient data for research: a critical review.常规收集的患者数据在研究中的应用:批判性评价。
Health (London). 2012 Jul;16(4):448-63. doi: 10.1177/1363459311425513. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
2
Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue.促进健康数据的道德使用以造福社会:电子健康记录、同意与易救援义务
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0130.
3
Handle with care.小心轻放。
Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):325-6. doi: 10.1038/464325b.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Electronic health records and research: privacy versus scientific priorities.电子健康记录与研究:隐私与科学优先事项
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):19-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492894.
6
Careless.data.粗心的数据。 (不过原英文表述不太规范,正确形式可能是“Careless data” )
Nature. 2014 Mar 6;507(7490):7. doi: 10.1038/507007a.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Controversial database of medical records is scrapped over security concerns.因安全担忧,有争议的医疗记录数据库被废弃。
BMJ. 2016 Jul 7;354:i3804. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3804.
9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
Is there a civic duty to support medical AI development by sharing electronic health records?是否有公民责任通过共享电子健康记录来支持医疗 AI 的发展?
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 10;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00871-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of routinely collected blood donation data for expanded HIV and Syphilis surveillance in Blantyre district, Malawi.利用常规采集的献血数据在马拉维布兰太尔地区扩大艾滋病毒和梅毒监测。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0300647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300647. eCollection 2024.
2
Persuasive Appeals in Genetic Biobank Recruitment Campaigns: Social and Ethical Implications.遗传生物库招募活动中的说服诉求:社会和伦理影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):284-295. doi: 10.1177/15562646231181028. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Using primary care databases for addiction research: An introduction and overview of strengths and weaknesses.
利用基层医疗数据库进行成瘾研究:优势与劣势介绍及概述
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Jan 13;15:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100407. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Staff and service users' views on a 'Consent for Contact' research register within psychosis services: a qualitative study.工作人员和服务使用者对精神病服务中“接触同意”研究登记册的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 24;14:377. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0377-6.