Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后静脉血栓栓塞的风险:并非所有节段都相同。

Risk of venous thromboembolism after spinal cord injury: not all levels are the same.

作者信息

Maung Adrian A, Schuster Kevin M, Kaplan Lewis J, Maerz Linda L, Davis Kimberly A

机构信息

Section of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Surgical Emergencies, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1241-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318235ded0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a diagnosis that includes both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a well-recognized complication following injury. Previous studies have identified multiple risk factors including spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized that the level of SCI also influences the likelihood of VTE.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried to identify all patients with SCI admitted in 2007 and 2008. Rates of VTE, demographics, admitting comorbidities, in-hospital complications, level of SCI (divided by National Trauma Data Bank into five groups), associated injuries, and outcome variables were abstracted. Multiple regression was used to identify independent risk factors for VTE.

RESULTS

During the 2-year period, 18,302 patients were admitted with SCI. The overall rate of VTE was 4.3% but varied significantly depending on the level of SCI injury (χ(2), 44.8; p < 0.05). Patients with high cervical spine (C1-4) injury had a rate VTE of 3.4%, whereas patients with high thoracic spine (T1-6) injury had the highest rate of VTE at 6.3%. The lowest rate of VTE was in patients with lumbar injury (3.2%). There were no significant differences in the preexisting comorbidities or in-hospital complications among the five SCI groups with the exception of pneumonia. In a multiple logistic regression model, the level of SCI was an independent risk factor for VTE as was increasing age, increasing Injury Severity Score, male gender, traumatic brain injury, and chest trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of VTE differs with various SCI levels. Patients with high thoracic (T1-6) injury seem to be at the highest risk and patients with high cervical (C1-4) injury at one of the lowest. A higher index of suspicion for VTE should therefore be maintained in patients with a high thoracic SCI. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

摘要

背景

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE),包括深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞,是损伤后一种公认的并发症。既往研究已确定多种危险因素,包括脊髓损伤(SCI)。我们推测SCI的损伤平面也会影响VTE的发生可能性。

方法

查询国家创伤数据库以确定2007年和2008年收治的所有SCI患者。提取VTE发生率、人口统计学资料、入院时合并症、院内并发症、SCI损伤平面(国家创伤数据库分为五组)、相关损伤及结局变量。采用多元回归分析确定VTE的独立危险因素。

结果

在这2年期间,18302例患者因SCI入院。VTE的总体发生率为4.3%,但根据SCI损伤平面不同有显著差异(χ²,44.8;p<0.05)。高位颈椎(C1 - 4)损伤患者的VTE发生率为3.4%,而高位胸椎(T1 - 6)损伤患者的VTE发生率最高,为6.3%。VTE发生率最低的是腰椎损伤患者(3.2%)。除肺炎外,五个SCI组的既往合并症或院内并发症无显著差异。在多元逻辑回归模型中,SCI损伤平面是VTE的独立危险因素,年龄增加、损伤严重程度评分增加、男性、创伤性脑损伤和胸部创伤也是危险因素。

结论

VTE发生率因SCI损伤平面不同而有所差异。高位胸椎(T1 - 6)损伤患者似乎风险最高,高位颈椎(C1 - 4)损伤患者风险最低。因此,对于高位胸椎SCI患者应保持更高的VTE怀疑指数。需要进一步研究以阐明潜在机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验