Suppr超能文献

EXCITE 试验:“未完成”Wolf 运动功能测试项目的分析。

The EXCITE Trial: analysis of "noncompleted" Wolf Motor Function Test items.

机构信息

Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Feb;26(2):178-87. doi: 10.1177/1545968311426437. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This is the first study to examine Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) tasks among EXCITE Trial participants that could not be completed at baseline or 2 weeks later.

METHODS

Data were collected from participants who received constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) immediately at the time of randomization (CIMT-I, n = 106) and from those for whom there was a delay of 1 year in receiving this intervention (CIMT-D, n = 116). Data were collected at baseline and at a 2-week time point, during which the CIMT-I group received the CIMT intervention and the CIMT-D group did not. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were used to examine repeated binary data and count values. Group and visit interactions were assessed, adjusting for functional level, affected side, dominant side, age, and gender covariates.

RESULTS

In CIMT-I participants, there was an increase in the proportion of completed tasks at posttest compared with CIMT-D participants, particularly with respect to those tasks requiring dexterity with small objects and total incompletes (P < .0033). Compared with baseline, 120 tasks governing distal limb use for CIMT-I and 58 tasks dispersed across the WMFT for CIMT-D could be completed after 2 weeks. Common movement components that may have contributed to incomplete tasks include shoulder stabilization and flexion, elbow flexion and extension, wrist pronation, supination and ulnar deviation, and pincer grip.

CONCLUSION

CIMT training should emphasize therapy for those specific movement components in patients who meet the EXCITE criteria for baseline motor control.

摘要

目的

这是第一项研究,旨在检查 EXCITE 试验参与者中无法在基线或 2 周后完成的 Wolf 运动功能测试(WMFT)任务。

方法

数据来自立即接受强制性运动疗法(CIMT)的参与者(CIMT-I,n=106)和延迟 1 年接受此干预的参与者(CIMT-D,n=116)。数据在基线和 2 周时间点收集,在此期间,CIMT-I 组接受 CIMT 干预,而 CIMT-D 组未接受。使用广义估计方程(GEE)分析重复的二进制数据和计数值。评估了组间和访问间的交互作用,调整了功能水平、受累侧、优势侧、年龄和性别协变量。

结果

在 CIMT-I 参与者中,与 CIMT-D 参与者相比,在测试后完成任务的比例增加,特别是在需要使用小物体进行灵巧性和总不完整的任务方面(P<.0033)。与基线相比,CIMT-I 中支配远侧肢体的 120 个任务和 CIMT-D 中分散在 WMFT 中的 58 个任务在 2 周后可以完成。可能导致未完成任务的常见运动成分包括肩部稳定和屈曲、肘部弯曲和伸展、腕部旋前、旋后和尺侧偏斜以及对掌抓握。

结论

CIMT 训练应强调针对符合基线运动控制 EXCITE 标准的患者的那些特定运动成分进行治疗。

相似文献

1
10
Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?狼运动功能测试能否简化?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jun;23(5):422-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331141. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?中风患者的运动“恢复”和“代偿”是什么意思?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):313-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328727. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验