Suppr超能文献

一项多中心、随机、2 期临床试验,旨在评估多西他赛联合卡铂及序贯疗法(多西他赛在先,卡铂在后)治疗铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌患者的疗效和安全性。

A multicenter, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination docetaxel and carboplatin and sequential therapy with docetaxel then carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2012 Jul 1;118(13):3283-93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26610. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination (cDC) and sequential (sDC) weekly docetaxel and carboplatin in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Participants were randomized to either weekly docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks or docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was measurable progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Between January 2004 and March 2007, 150 participants were enrolled. The response rate was 55.4% and 43.2% for those treated with cDC and sDC, respectively. The median PFS was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9-16.8) for cDC and 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.1-11.0) for sDC. On the basis of an exploratory analysis, patients treated with sDC were at a 62% increased risk of disease progression compared to those treated with cDC (hazard ratio = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.08-2.45; P = .02). The median overall survival time was similar in both groups (33.2 and 30.1 months, P = .2). The incidence of grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was higher with cDC than with sDC (11.7% vs 8.5%; 36.8% vs 11.3%). The sDC group demonstrated significant improvements in the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-Ovarian, Quality of Life Trial Outcome Index scores compared with the combination cohort (P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Both cDC and sDC regimens have activity in recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC with acceptable toxicity profiles. The cDC regimen may provide a PFS advantage over sDC.

摘要

背景

本随机临床试验旨在评估联合(cDC)和序贯(sDC)每周多西他赛和卡铂在复发性铂敏感上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)女性中的疗效和安全性。

方法

参与者随机分为每周多西他赛 30 mg/m²(第 1 和 8 天)和卡铂曲线下面积(AUC)= 6(第 1 天),每 3 周一次,或多西他赛 30 mg/m²(第 1 和 8 天),每 3 周一次,共 6 个周期,然后卡铂 AUC = 6(第 1 天),每 3 周一次,共 6 个周期,直至疾病进展。主要终点是可测量的无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

2004 年 1 月至 2007 年 3 月期间,共纳入 150 名参与者。cDC 和 sDC 治疗组的缓解率分别为 55.4%和 43.2%。cDC 的中位 PFS 为 13.7 个月(95%置信区间[CI],9.9-16.8),sDC 为 8.4 个月(95%CI,7.1-11.0)。基于探索性分析,与 cDC 相比,sDC 治疗组疾病进展的风险增加了 62%(风险比=1.62;95%CI,1.08-2.45;P=0.02)。两组中位总生存时间相似(33.2 和 30.1 个月,P=0.2)。cDC 组的 2 级或 3 级神经毒性和 3 级或 4 级中性粒细胞减少症发生率高于 sDC 组(11.7%比 8.5%;36.8%比 11.3%)。与联合组相比,sDC 组功能性评估癌症治疗-卵巢生存质量试验结局指数评分有显著改善(P=0.013)。

结论

cDC 和 sDC 方案在复发性铂敏感 EOC 中均有活性,且毒性谱可接受。cDC 方案可能比 sDC 方案提供 PFS 优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验