Gupta Subhash Chandra, Sinha Vinod Kumar, Praharaj Samir Kumar, Gandotra Sachin
Department of Psychiatry, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Teignmouth, United Kingdom.
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;23(4):243-9.
To identify the factor structure of manic symptoms in adolescents as assessed by the Scale for Manic States (SMS).
Pattern of symptoms was assessed in a group of 100 adolescents with a diagnosis of manic episode as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision - Diagnostic Criteria for Research. A principal component analysis of the broad range of psychiatric symptoms covered by the SMS was conducted.
Seven eigenvalues were greater than unity, and parallel analysis revealed 5 factors, whereas scree plot was inconclusive. Five-factor solution as obtained by parallel analysis was chosen, which described our data appropriately and were clinically relevant. The 5 factors were: aggressive overactivity, dysphoria, psychosis, hedonia, and thought retardation. These captured 58.14% of the total variance.
These 5 factors explain the clinical dimensions in adolescent mania similar to those of the adult population. Nevertheless, certain features, such as presence of psychosis along with euphoric mood and thought retardation, distinguish adolescent from adult mania.
通过躁狂状态量表(SMS)评估来确定青少年躁狂症状的因子结构。
对一组100名被诊断为符合《国际疾病分类》第10版——研究用诊断标准所定义的躁狂发作的青少年的症状模式进行评估。对SMS涵盖的广泛精神症状进行主成分分析。
七个特征值大于1,平行分析显示有5个因子,而碎石图结果不明确。选择通过平行分析获得的五因子解决方案,该方案能恰当地描述我们的数据且具有临床相关性。这5个因子分别为:攻击性多动、烦躁不安、精神病性症状、快感缺失和思维迟缓。这些因子解释了总方差的58.14%。
这5个因子解释了青少年躁狂症与成人相似的临床维度。然而,某些特征,如精神病性症状与欣快情绪及思维迟缓同时存在,使青少年躁狂症有别于成人躁狂症。