Sato Tetsuya, Bottlender Ronald, Kleindienst Nikolaus, Möller Hans-Jürgen
Psychiatrische Klinik der Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, München, Germany.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):968-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.968.
There are no factor analytic studies specifically including symptoms representative of depressive inhibition among manic patients, although Kraepelin described several mixed affective states with depressive inhibition. There is controversy as to whether atypical manic features such as aggression, psychosis, and depression are likely to coexist among manic patients. The authors' goal was to examine this controversy.
They used a standardized instrument to assess the presence or absence of 37 psychiatric symptoms in 576 consecutive inpatients who were diagnosed as having DSM-IV manic episode, nonmixed or mixed.
A principal-component analysis followed by varimax rotation extracted seven independent interpretable factors (depressive mood, irritable aggression, insomnia, depressive inhibition, pure manic symptoms, emotional lability/agitation, and psychosis) that were relatively stable across several patient groups. A subsequent cluster analysis identified four phenomenological subtypes underlying acute mania: pure, aggressive, psychotic, and depressive (mixed) mania. Several variables, including gender, suicidality, and outcome of treatments, significantly differentiated the subtypes.
In patients with mania, depressive inhibition may be a salient syndrome independent of depressive mood, lending some support to Kraepelin's classification of mixed manic states on the basis of the permutations of three elements-thought disorder, mood, and psychomotor activity. Depressive inhibition, together with depressive mood and emotional lability/agitation, appears to be an important phenomenological element of mixed states. Atypical manic features such as aggression, psychosis, and depression are not likely to coexist, but they are likely separately to characterize several different subtypes potentially underlying acute mania.
尽管克雷佩林描述了几种伴有抑郁性抑制的混合情感状态,但尚无专门纳入躁狂症患者中代表抑郁性抑制症状的因素分析研究。关于攻击、精神病和抑郁等非典型躁狂特征是否可能在躁狂症患者中共存存在争议。作者的目标是研究这一争议。
他们使用一种标准化工具,对576名连续住院患者进行评估,这些患者被诊断为患有DSM-IV躁狂发作,非混合性或混合性。
主成分分析后进行方差最大化旋转,提取出七个独立可解释的因素(抑郁情绪、易激惹性攻击、失眠、抑郁性抑制、单纯躁狂症状、情绪不稳定/激动和精神病),这些因素在几个患者组中相对稳定。随后的聚类分析确定了急性躁狂症潜在的四种现象学亚型:单纯型、攻击型、精神病型和抑郁(混合)型躁狂症。包括性别、自杀倾向和治疗结果在内的几个变量显著区分了这些亚型。
在躁狂症患者中,抑郁性抑制可能是一种独立于抑郁情绪的显著综合征,这为克雷佩林基于思维障碍、情绪和精神运动活动这三个要素的排列组合对混合躁狂状态进行分类提供了一些支持。抑郁性抑制,连同抑郁情绪和情绪不稳定/激动,似乎是混合状态的一个重要现象学要素。攻击、精神病和抑郁等非典型躁狂特征不太可能共存,但它们可能分别表征急性躁狂症潜在的几种不同亚型。