Sennbro Carl Johan, Knutsson Magnus, van Amsterdam Peter, Timmerman Philip
Active Biotech, Scheelevägen 22, S-22007 Lund, Sweden.
Bioanalysis. 2011 Nov;3(21):2393-9. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.239.
In regulated bioanalysis, the need for partial validation when changing the counter ion of the anticoagulant is currently being debated within the bioanalytical community. To date, industry and the health authorities have not yet reached a consensus on this issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a change in counter ion when using the same anticoagulant on LC-MS/MS assay performance for a broad array of new chemical entities, compiling data generated at companies within the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF).
In all, 15 EBF member companies provided experimental data on partial validation. In total, data from 42 LC-MS/MS assays were evaluated. The results show that a change in counter ion when using the same anticoagulant had no impact on assay performance.
Based on these results and on conclusions from previous studies, the EBF recommends that in regulated bioanalysis, plasma samples containing different counter ions, but the same anticoagulant, should be regarded as equal matrices, thus removing any need for partial validation.
在规范的生物分析中,生物分析领域目前正在讨论在改变抗凝剂的抗衡离子时进行部分验证的必要性。迄今为止,业界和卫生当局尚未就该问题达成共识。本研究的目的是评估在使用相同抗凝剂时改变抗衡离子对一系列新化学实体的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)分析性能的影响,汇总欧洲生物分析论坛(EBF)内各公司生成的数据。
共有15家EBF成员公司提供了部分验证的实验数据。总共评估了42种LC-MS/MS分析的数据。结果表明,使用相同抗凝剂时抗衡离子的改变对分析性能没有影响。
基于这些结果以及先前研究的结论,EBF建议在规范的生物分析中,含有不同抗衡离子但相同抗凝剂的血浆样本应被视为等效基质,因此无需进行部分验证。