Considerations on the use of patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.
作者信息
Alemayehu Demissie, Sanchez Robert J, Cappelleri Joseph C
机构信息
Pfizer, Inc, 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA.
出版信息
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S27-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-a.S27.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Considerations on the use of patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.关于在比较效果研究中使用患者报告结局的思考。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S27-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-a.S27.
2
Gathering data from older adults via proxy respondents: research challenges.
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Nov;1(6):467-70. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.54.
3
"Ten commandments" for conducting comparative effectiveness research using "real-world data".使用“真实世界数据”进行比较效果研究的“十诫”
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S10-5. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-a.S10.
4
Effectiveness in the Absence of Efficacy: Cautionary Tales From Real-World Evidence.缺乏疗效时的有效性：来自真实世界证据的警示故事
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1047-1050. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02105. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Commonly used data-collection approaches in clinical research.临床研究中常用的数据收集方法。
Am J Med. 2013 Nov;126(11):946-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
6
Interview: access to richer data promises to usher in a new era of insight into patient heterogeneity.访谈：获取更丰富的数据有望开创一个洞察患者异质性的新时代。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Mar;2(2):109-12. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.5.
7
Commentary: Clinical informatics.
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S36-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257ddeb.
8
It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.需要注意的是，真实世界数据（RWD）永远无法取代更为传统且更为可靠的随机对照试验（RCT）数据；然而，新出现的趋势是纳入更具普遍性的数据。引言。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S03-4.
9
Infrastructure requirements for secondary data sources in comparative effectiveness research.比较效果研究中二次数据源的基础设施要求。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S16-21. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-a.S16.
10
Handling missing data in propensity score estimation in comparative effectiveness evaluations: a systematic review.比较效果评估中倾向评分估计里缺失数据的处理：一项系统综述
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Mar;7(3):271-279. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0071. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparisons among Health Behavior Surveys: Implications for the Design of Informatics Infrastructures That Support Comparative Effectiveness Research.健康行为调查之间的比较：对支持比较效果研究的信息学基础设施设计的启示。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 May 31;1(1):1021. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1021. eCollection 2013.
2
Differential-Private Data Publishing Through Component Analysis.
Trans Data Priv. 2013 Apr;6(1):19-34.
Zotero 插件