Department of Electrical Engineering, Ira Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Dec;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.08.036.
We investigated the possibility of differential diagnosis of patients with epileptic seizures (ES) and patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) through an advanced analysis of the dynamics of the patients' scalp EEGs. The underlying principle was the presence of resetting of brain's preictal spatiotemporal entrainment following onset of ES and the absence of resetting following PNES. Long-term (days) scalp EEGs recorded from five patients with ES and six patients with PNES were analyzed. It was found that: (1) Preictal entrainment of brain sites was reset at ES (P<0.05) in four of the five patients with ES, and not reset (P=0.28) in the fifth patient. (2) Resetting did not occur (p>0.1) in any of the six patients with PNES. These preliminary results in patients with ES are in agreement with our previous findings from intracranial EEG recordings on resetting of brain dynamics by ES and are expected to constitute the basis for the development of a reliable and supporting tool in the differential diagnosis between ES and PNES. Finally, we believe that these results shed light on the electrophysiology of PNES by showing that occurrence of PNES does not assist patients in overcoming a pathological entrainment of brain dynamics. This article is part of a Supplemental Special Issue entitled The Future of Automated Seizure Detection and Prediction.
我们通过对患者头皮脑电图动力学的高级分析,研究了鉴别癫痫发作(ES)患者和心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)患者的可能性。其潜在原理是 ES 发作后大脑的预发性时空同步会被重置,而 PNES 后则不会被重置。对五名 ES 患者和六名 PNES 患者的长期(数天)头皮脑电图进行了分析。结果发现:(1)ES 患者中,有四名患者的大脑部位的预发性同步在 ES 时被重置(P<0.05),而第五名患者未被重置(P=0.28)。(2)在六名 PNES 患者中,均未发生重置(p>0.1)。ES 患者的这些初步结果与我们之前从颅内 EEG 记录中得出的 ES 重置大脑动力学的发现一致,有望为 ES 和 PNES 之间的鉴别诊断提供可靠和支持性工具的开发奠定基础。最后,我们认为这些结果通过表明 PNES 的发生并不能帮助患者克服大脑动力学的病理性同步,为 PNES 的电生理学提供了新的认识。本文是题为“自动癫痫发作检测和预测的未来”的增刊特刊的一部分。