Festinger David S, Dugosh Karen L, Croft Jason R, Arabia Patricia L, Marlowe Douglas B
Treatment Research Institute.
Ethics Behav. 2010 Jan 1;20(5):387-399. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2010.491767.
This study examined the efficacy of corrected feedback for improving consent recall throughout the course of an ongoing longitudinal study. Participants (N = 135) were randomly assigned to either a corrected feedback or a no-feedback control condition. Participants completed a consent quiz 2-weeks after consenting to the host study and at months 1, 2, and 3. The corrected feedback group received corrections to erroneous responses and the no-feedback control group did not. The feedback group displayed significantly greater recall overall and in specific content areas (i.e., procedures, protections, risks/benefits). Results support the use of corrected feedback for improving consent recall.
本研究在一项正在进行的纵向研究过程中,考察了纠正性反馈对提高同意书回忆效果的有效性。参与者(N = 135)被随机分配到纠正性反馈组或无反馈对照组。参与者在同意参与主体研究两周后以及第1、2和3个月时完成了一份同意书测验。纠正性反馈组收到了对错误回答的纠正,无反馈对照组则没有。反馈组在总体以及特定内容领域(即程序、保护措施、风险/益处)的回忆表现明显更好。研究结果支持使用纠正性反馈来提高同意书回忆效果。