Suppr超能文献

金钱激励可提高对研究同意信息的回忆:记住是有回报的。

Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember.

作者信息

Festinger David S, Marlowe Douglas B, Croft Jason R, Dugosh Karen L, Arabia Patricia L, Benasutti Kathleen M

机构信息

Treatment Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;17(2):99-104. doi: 10.1037/a0015421.

Abstract

Research participants often fail to recall substantial amounts of informed consent information after delays of only a few days. Numerous interventions have proven effective at improving consent recall; however, virtually all have focused on compensating for potential cognitive deficits and have ignored motivational factors. In this pilot study, the authors randomly assigned 31 drug court clients participating in a clinical research trial to a control group that received a standard informed consent procedure or to a group that received the same procedure plus incentives for correctly recalling consent information. The incentive group was told they would receive $5 for each of the 15 consent items they could answer correctly 1 week later. At the follow-up, the incentive group recalled a significantly greater percentage of consent information overall than the control group (65% vs. 42%, p<.01). Findings from this study have important implications for the ethical conduct of human subject research. The incentivized consent procedure may be useful for improving consent recall in research studies, particularly those involving potentially serious side effects. The results also provide an important "proof of concept" regarding the utility of motivational procedures for improving recall of consent information.

摘要

研究参与者往往在仅仅延迟几天之后就无法回忆起大量的知情同意信息。许多干预措施已被证明在提高同意信息的回忆方面是有效的;然而,几乎所有这些措施都集中在弥补潜在的认知缺陷上,而忽略了动机因素。在这项试点研究中,作者将31名参与一项临床研究试验的药物法庭客户随机分为两组,一组为接受标准知情同意程序的对照组,另一组为接受相同程序并因正确回忆同意信息而获得奖励的组。奖励组被告知,对于他们在1周后能够正确回答的15项同意信息中的每一项,将获得5美元。在随访时,奖励组总体上回忆起的同意信息百分比显著高于对照组(65%对42%,p<0.01)。这项研究的结果对人体研究的伦理行为具有重要意义。这种有激励措施的同意程序可能有助于提高研究中同意信息的回忆,特别是那些涉及潜在严重副作用的研究。这些结果也为动机程序在提高同意信息回忆方面的效用提供了一个重要的“概念验证”。

相似文献

1
Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;17(2):99-104. doi: 10.1037/a0015421.
2
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques.
J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):264-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101124. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
Recall and Retention of Consent Procedure Contents and Decisions: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(1-2):27-36. doi: 10.1159/000492662. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):918-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820a9193. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
8
Testing with feedback improves recall of information in informed consent: A proof of concept study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Comprehension and recall from the informed consent process by phase I healthy volunteers before dose administration.
Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):283-289. doi: 10.1177/1740774519834257. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.
Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Aug;21(4):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00347-5.
4
The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Mar 28;4(1):2381468319840322. doi: 10.1177/2381468319840322. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
6
Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Oct;81:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2016;25(5):417-427. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2015.1056866. Epub 2016 May 4.
8
A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.
Clin Trials. 2015 Feb;12(1):54-66. doi: 10.1177/1740774514560831. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2014;28(13-14):1623-38. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947627. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
10
Contingency management for cocaine treatment: cash vs. vouchers.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Aug;47(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Response strength in multiple schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):389-408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389.
3
Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Jun 1;78(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.011. Epub 2005 Jan 23.
4
On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Mar;83(2):119-28. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.94-03.
6
Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness.
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jun;52(6):780-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.780.
7
Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):263-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.263.
8
Informed consent in clinical trials.
Health Policy. 1996 May;36(2):131-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5.
9
Informed consent for clinical trials: in search of the "best" method.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1825-40. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00235-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验