Suppr超能文献

老年人元认知知识更新的效果:来自单词频率元记忆判断的证据。

The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):683-90. doi: 10.1037/a0025838. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

Abstract

Accurate metacognitive knowledge is vital for optimal performance in self-regulated learning. Yet older adults have deficiencies in implementing effective learning strategies and knowledge updating and consequently may not learn as effectively from task experience as younger adults. Here we assess the ability of older adults to update metacognitive knowledge about the effects of word frequency on recognition. Young adults have been shown to correct their misconceptions through experience with the task, but the greater difficulty older adults have with knowledge updating makes it unclear whether task experience will be sufficient for older adults. The performance of older adults in this experiment qualitatively replicates the results of a comparison group of younger subjects, indicating that both groups are able to correct their metacognitive knowledge through task experience. Older adults seem to possess more effective and flexible metacognition than sometimes suggested.

摘要

准确的元认知知识对于自我调节学习的最佳表现至关重要。然而,老年人在实施有效的学习策略和知识更新方面存在不足,因此可能无法像年轻人那样从任务经验中有效地学习。在这里,我们评估了老年人更新关于词汇频率对识别影响的元认知知识的能力。已经表明,年轻人通过任务经验可以纠正他们的误解,但是老年人在知识更新方面的困难更大,这使得不确定任务经验是否足以满足老年人的需求。老年人在这个实验中的表现定性地复制了年轻对照组的结果,表明两组都能够通过任务经验纠正他们的元认知知识。老年人的元认知似乎比有时所建议的更有效和灵活。

相似文献

4
Does age affect metacognition? A cross-domain investigation using a hierarchical Bayesian framework.
Cognition. 2025 May;258:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106089. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
7
Age-related differences in strategy knowledge updating: blocked testing produces greater improvements in metacognitive accuracy for younger than older adults.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Sep;15(5):601-26. doi: 10.1080/13825580801956225. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
9
Evidence for an Age-Related Positivity Effect in Metacognitive Judgments.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Aug 13;76(7):1282-1291. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa177.
10
Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
Autism. 2014 May;18(4):393-408. doi: 10.1177/1362361313479453. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Someone else's ears: Metacognitive auditory perspective taking in young and older adults.
Iperception. 2025 Jul 9;16(4):20416695251349735. doi: 10.1177/20416695251349735. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Metacognitive awareness of the pretesting effect improves with self-regulation support.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1461-1480. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01392-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
The item/order account of word frequency effects: Evidence from serial order tests.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Aug;49(6):1188-1203. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01144-7. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
Aging and recognition memory: A meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;145(4):339-371. doi: 10.1037/bul0000185. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Predicting others' knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1360-1375. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0842-4.
7
The Effect of Word Frequency on Judgments of Learning: Contributions of Beliefs and Processing Fluency.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1995. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01995. eCollection 2015.
8
Too easy? The influence of task demands conveyed tacitly on prospective memory.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 30;9:242. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00242. eCollection 2015.
10
The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1014-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0768-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):429-42. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0274-5.
2
Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test-expectancy paradigm.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):632-52. doi: 10.1037/a0026215. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
3
On the effectiveness of self-paced learning.
J Mem Lang. 2011 Feb 1;64(2):109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.002.
4
The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning.
Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):196-203. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0010-y.
5
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86. doi: 10.1037/a0017341.
6
Why do people show minimal knowledge updating with task experience: inferential deficit or experimental artifact?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):155-73. doi: 10.1080/17470210701855520. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
7
Age-related differences in strategy knowledge updating: blocked testing produces greater improvements in metacognitive accuracy for younger than older adults.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Sep;15(5):601-26. doi: 10.1080/13825580801956225. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
8
Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):174-9. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.174.
10
Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits - and costs - of dropping flashcards.
Memory. 2008 Feb;16(2):125-36. doi: 10.1080/09658210701763899.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验