Suppr超能文献

策略知识更新中的年龄差异:分组测试对年轻人元认知准确性的提升比对老年人更大。

Age-related differences in strategy knowledge updating: blocked testing produces greater improvements in metacognitive accuracy for younger than older adults.

作者信息

Price Jodi, Hertzog Christopher, Dunlosky John

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Sep;15(5):601-26. doi: 10.1080/13825580801956225. Epub 2008 Apr 30.

Abstract

Age-related differences in updating knowledge about strategy effectiveness after task experience have not been consistently found, perhaps because the magnitude of observed knowledge updating has been rather meager for both age groups. We examined whether creating homogeneous blocks of recall tests based on two strategies used at encoding (imagery and repetition) would enhance people's learning about strategy effects on recall. Younger and older adults demonstrated greater knowledge updating (as measured by questionnaire ratings of strategy effectiveness and by global judgments of performance) with blocked (versus random) testing. The benefit of blocked testing for absolute accuracy of global predictions was smaller for older than younger adults. However, individual differences in correlations of strategy effectiveness ratings and postdictions showed similar upgrades for both age groups. Older adults learn about imagery's superior effectiveness but do not accurately estimate the magnitude of its benefit, even after blocked testing.

摘要

任务经验后关于策略有效性的知识更新方面的年龄差异尚未得到一致的发现,这可能是因为两个年龄组观察到的知识更新幅度都相当小。我们研究了根据编码时使用的两种策略(表象和重复)创建同质的回忆测试块是否会增强人们对策略对回忆影响的学习。年轻人和老年人在进行分组(而非随机)测试时,表现出了更多的知识更新(通过对策略有效性的问卷评分和对表现的整体判断来衡量)。分组测试对整体预测绝对准确性的益处,老年人比年轻人小。然而,两个年龄组在策略有效性评分与事后预测的相关性方面的个体差异都有类似的提升。老年人了解到表象的卓越有效性,但即使在分组测试后,也无法准确估计其益处的大小。

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in strategy knowledge updating: blocked testing produces greater improvements in metacognitive accuracy for younger than older adults.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Sep;15(5):601-26. doi: 10.1080/13825580801956225. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
3
Age differences in the effects of experimenter-instructed versus self-generated strategy use.
Exp Aging Res. 2012;38(1):42-62. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.637005.
6
Why do people show minimal knowledge updating with task experience: inferential deficit or experimental artifact?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):155-73. doi: 10.1080/17470210701855520. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
10
Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.
Psychol Aging. 1997 Mar;12(1):50-71. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.12.1.50.

引用本文的文献

3
Instructing Use of an Effective Strategy Improves Recognition Memory in Healthy Adults.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Mar 4;78(3):383-393. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac144.
4
A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Jun;33(5):821-848. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2050411. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
Knowing What Others Know: Younger and Older Adults' Perspective-Taking and Memory for Medication Information.
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2019 Dec;8(4):481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Accuracy and speed feedback: global and local effects on strategy use.
Exp Aging Res. 2014;40(3):332-56. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.897150.
10
Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):429-42. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0274-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do people show minimal knowledge updating with task experience: inferential deficit or experimental artifact?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):155-73. doi: 10.1080/17470210701855520. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
2
The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):238-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.238.
3
Memory and reality.
Am Psychol. 2006 Nov;61(8):760-771. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760.
4
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
7
Another source of individual differences: strategy adaptivity to changing rates of success.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Mar;130(1):59-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.59.
8
Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1744-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1744.
10
Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1170-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1170.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验