Translational Cancer Research Group-Antwerp, Oncology Centre, St. Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Nov;13(11):805-8. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0737-3.
BACKGROUND The mechanisms of tumour progression during anti-VEGF-A treatment are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS Two patients with metastatic breast cancer are described who developed new metastases while receiving anti-VEGF-A treatment. Angiogenic parameters were determined by CD34/Ki67 double staining, Chalkley counts (CC) and endothelial cell proliferation fractions (ECP). RT-PCR Taqman low-density arrays with a gene panel of 94 angiogenesis-related genes were performed on both metastases and compared to 10 unselected primary breast tumours. RESULTS Both lesions showed a high and intermediate CC of, respectively, 7.5±0.62 and 4.8±0.2. Both lesions had elevated ECP values of 14% and 8%. Low-density array screening showed that VEGFR1 mRNA was overexpressed in both samples (z-score=7.85 and 7.81) compared to control samples (out of range [min-max]). Additional analysis confirmed this finding at the protein level by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION These observations suggest that tumour progression under continuous anti-VEGF-A continues to be angiogenesis dependent. Further exploration is needed to identify the mechanisms of anti-VEGF-A resistance in order to design combination-targeted therapies.
抗 VEGF-A 治疗期间肿瘤进展的机制尚未完全明了。
描述了两名转移性乳腺癌患者,他们在接受抗 VEGF-A 治疗时出现新的转移病灶。通过 CD34/Ki67 双重染色、Chalkley 计数 (CC) 和内皮细胞增殖分数 (ECP) 确定血管生成参数。对两个转移病灶和 10 个未选择的原发性乳腺癌进行了 RT-PCR Taqman 低密度基因芯片分析,该基因芯片包含 94 个与血管生成相关的基因。
两个病变的 CC 分别为 7.5±0.62 和 4.8±0.2,均较高和中等;两个病变的 ECP 值分别为 14%和 8%。低密度基因芯片筛选显示,与对照样本(超出范围 [最小值-最大值])相比,两个样本中的 VEGFR1 mRNA 均过度表达(z 分数=7.85 和 7.81)。免疫组织化学进一步证实了这一发现。
这些观察结果表明,在持续抗 VEGF-A 治疗下肿瘤进展仍然依赖于血管生成。需要进一步探索以确定抗 VEGF-A 耐药的机制,以便设计联合靶向治疗。