Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Dec;38(12):1145-50. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318238b846.
The community at which public health strategies for reducing syphilis epidemics are potentially targeted may have different considerations with regards to their sexual and health priorities. We aimed to elicit information on the acceptability of behavior change interventions among gay men for reducing syphilis transmission.
We conducted an online survey (n = 2306 participants) and focus groups to determine whether further sexual behavior change to reduce syphilis is likely to be acceptable to gay men in Australia.
One quarter of survey respondents (26%) indicated that they would be highly likely to reduce partner acquisition rates in order to reduce their chances of syphilis infection. However, among the 475 (21%) men who reported greater than 10 partners in the previous 6 months, only 11% indicated being "highly likely" to reduce partner numbers to avoid syphilis. Among 606 (26%) survey respondents who reported not always using condoms in the previous 6 months, 34% indicated being highly likely to always use condoms with casual partners to avoid syphilis. In the focus groups, men indicated little commitment to sexual behavior change but some willingness to consider short-term changes to reduce community syphilis levels.
Interventions promoting partner reduction or increased condom use are unlikely to be adopted on a long-term basis by men at greatest risk. Behavioral interventions alone are unlikely to materially contribute to syphilis prevention among gay men.
旨在减少梅毒流行的公共卫生策略的目标人群,其性健康优先事项可能存在不同的考虑因素。我们旨在了解减少梅毒传播的行为改变干预措施在男同性恋者中的可接受性。
我们进行了一项在线调查(n = 2306 名参与者)和焦点小组,以确定进一步的性行为改变以减少梅毒是否可能被澳大利亚的男同性恋者接受。
四分之一的调查参与者(26%)表示,他们很可能会降低性伴侣的获得率,以降低感染梅毒的机会。然而,在报告过去 6 个月内有超过 10 个性伴侣的 475 名(21%)男性中,只有 11%表示“非常可能”减少性伴侣数量以避免梅毒。在 606 名(26%)报告过去 6 个月内没有始终使用安全套的调查参与者中,34%表示“非常可能”在与偶然伴侣发生性行为时始终使用安全套以避免梅毒。在焦点小组中,男性表示对性行为改变的承诺很少,但愿意考虑短期改变以降低社区梅毒水平。
减少性伴侣或增加安全套使用的干预措施不太可能长期被风险最高的男性所接受。仅行为干预不太可能对男同性恋者预防梅毒产生实质性贡献。