Cardiologic Hospital CHU Bordeaux - CIC0005, Bordeaux University, Pessac, France.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity and reproducibility of three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) strain parameters in the assessment of global left ventricular (LV) systolic function.
A total of 128 subjects with differing LV ejection fractions were investigated using two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) and 3DE strains. Three-dimensional echocardiographic strain allows obtaining longitudinal, circumferential, radial, and area strains. First, values of global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2DE and 3DE speckle-tracking analyses were compared. Thereafter, 3DE strain parameters were correlated with LV ejection fraction and indexed output. Last, the variability of 3DE versus 2DE strain measurements as well as recorded time of analysis were assessed.
After excluding 21 patients for insufficient image quality, four for arrhythmia, two for severe valvular disease, and one for severe dyspnea, the final population consisted of 100 patients. Comparison between 2DE and 3DE GLS revealed high correspondence (r = 0.91, y = 1.04x - 0.71) and mean error measurement of -1.3% (95% confidence interval, -5.7 to 3.2). Among strain parameters, global area strain exhibited the highest correlation with LV ejection fraction (y = -1.65 + 10.4, r = -0.92, P < .001). Intraobserver measurement variability proved acceptable: 8% for GLS (vs 6% on 2DE analysis), 7% for circumferential strain (vs 15% on 2DE analysis), 7% for radial strain (vs 33% on 2DE analysis), and 5% for global area strain. The mean error between two measurements was lower with 3DE than 2DE analysis for circumferential and radial strains but similar for GLS. The mean time of analysis was of 117 ± 16 sec for 3DE analysis, which was 25% less than for 2DE analysis (P < .001).
Of all strain parameters, new 3DE area strain correlated best with common LV systolic function parameters and is thus the most promising approach, while all 3DE strain markers exhibited good reproducibility.
本研究旨在评估三维超声心动图(3DE)应变参数评估整体左心室(LV)收缩功能的能力和可重复性。
使用二维超声心动图(2DE)和 3DE 应变对 128 例不同左心室射血分数的患者进行了研究。3DE 应变可获得纵向、周向、径向和面积应变。首先,比较了 2DE 和 3DE 斑点追踪分析的整体纵向应变(GLS)值。然后,将 3DE 应变参数与 LV 射血分数和指数输出相关联。最后,评估了 3DE 与 2DE 应变测量的变异性以及记录的分析时间。
排除图像质量不足的 21 例患者、心律失常的 4 例患者、严重瓣膜病的 2 例患者和严重呼吸困难的 1 例患者后,最终人群由 100 例患者组成。2DE 和 3DE GLS 之间的比较显示出高度的一致性(r = 0.91,y = 1.04x - 0.71)和平均误差测量值为-1.3%(95%置信区间,-5.7 至 3.2)。在应变参数中,整体面积应变与 LV 射血分数相关性最高(y = -1.65 + 10.4,r = -0.92,P <.001)。观察者内测量变异性证明是可以接受的:GLS 为 8%(2DE 分析为 6%),周向应变 7%(2DE 分析为 15%),径向应变 7%(2DE 分析为 33%),整体面积应变 5%。与 2DE 分析相比,3DE 分析的两次测量之间的平均误差较低,而 GLS 的平均误差则相似。3DE 分析的平均分析时间为 117 ± 16 秒,比 2DE 分析少 25%(P <.001)。
在所有应变参数中,新的 3DE 面积应变与常见的 LV 收缩功能参数相关性最好,因此是最有前途的方法,而所有 3DE 应变标志物均表现出良好的可重复性。