Suppr超能文献

每 4 周评估一次华法林剂量与每 12 周评估一次在稳定国际标准化比值的患者中的比较:一项随机试验。

Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios: a randomized trial.

机构信息

McMaster University, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, and Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):653-9, W201-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that patients receiving warfarin undergo international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring every 4 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether assessment of warfarin dosing every 12 weeks is as safe as assessment every 4 weeks.

DESIGN

Noninferiority randomized trial. The randomization schedule (in a 1:1 ratio) was computer-generated, and allocation was concealed until the database was locked by using a centralized schedule. Patients, study and clinical personnel, adjudicators of clinical events, and the study statistician were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00356759) SETTING: Single center in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

250 patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy, whose dose was unchanged for at least 6 months; 226 completed the study.

INTERVENTION

Dosing assessment every 12 weeks (n = 124) compared with every 4 weeks (n = 126) for 12 months. Patients in the 12-week group were tested every 4 weeks; sham INRs within the target range were reported for two of the three 4-week periods.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of time in the therapeutic range (primary outcome) and number of extreme INRs, changes in maintenance dose, major bleeding events, objectively verified thromboembolism, and death (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

The percentage of time in the therapeutic range was 74.1% (SD, 18.8%) in the 4-week group compared with 71.6% (SD, 20.0%) in the 12-week group (absolute difference, 2.5 percentage points [1-sided 97.5% upper confidence bound, 7.3 percentage points]; noninferiority P = 0.020 for a 7.5-percentage point margin). Fewer patients in the 12-week group than in the 4-week group had any dose changes (37.1% vs. 55.6%; absolute difference, 18.5 percentage points [95% CI, 6.1 to 30.0 percentage points]; P = 0.004). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.

LIMITATIONS

Patients in the 12-week group had testing and contact with clinic staff every 4 weeks. The study was conducted at a single center and used surrogate outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of warfarin dosing every 12 weeks seems to be safe and noninferior to assessment every 4 weeks. A comparison of INR testing, patient contact, and warfarin dose assessment every 12 weeks versus every 4 weeks is necessary before INR testing every 12 weeks can be routinely recommended for practice.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation.

摘要

背景

指南建议接受华法林治疗的患者每 4 周进行一次国际标准化比值(INR)监测。

目的

研究每 12 周评估华法林剂量是否与每 4 周评估一样安全。

设计

非劣效性随机试验。随机分组方案(1:1 比例)是通过计算机生成的,并且在数据库被中央时间表锁定之前,使用隐藏的方法对分配进行隐藏。患者、研究和临床人员、临床事件裁决者以及研究统计人员对治疗分配均不知情。(临床试验.gov 注册号:NCT00356759)

地点

加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿的单中心。

患者

250 名接受长期华法林治疗的患者,其剂量至少稳定 6 个月;226 名完成了研究。

干预

每 12 周(n=124)评估剂量与每 4 周(n=126)评估剂量相比,持续 12 个月。12 周组的患者每 4 周进行一次检测;在三个 4 周周期中的两个周期中,报告了目标范围内的假 INR。

测量

治疗范围内的时间百分比(主要结局)和极端 INR 的数量、维持剂量的变化、大出血事件、客观证实的血栓栓塞和死亡(次要结局)。

结果

4 周组的治疗范围内时间百分比为 74.1%(标准差,18.8%),12 周组为 71.6%(标准差,20.0%)(绝对差异,2.5 个百分点[单侧 97.5%置信上限,7.3 个百分点];非劣效性 P=0.020,边界为 7.5 个百分点)。与 4 周组相比,12 周组的患者有更多的剂量变化(37.1% vs. 55.6%;绝对差异,18.5 个百分点[95%置信区间,6.1 至 30.0 个百分点];P=0.004)。两组的次要结局无差异。

局限性

12 周组的患者每 4 周接受检测和与临床工作人员联系。该研究在单中心进行,并使用替代结局。

结论

每 12 周评估华法林剂量似乎是安全的,与每 4 周评估相比无差异。在常规推荐 INR 每 12 周检测之前,有必要比较 INR 检测、患者接触和每 12 周评估华法林剂量与每 4 周评估华法林剂量。

主要资金来源

医师服务公司基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验