Suppr超能文献

评估脊柱关节炎的工作不稳定性:使用强直性脊柱炎工作不稳定性量表的横断面研究。

Assessment of work instability in spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study using the ankylosing spondylitis work instability scale.

机构信息

Medicine Faculty, Paris Descartes University, APHP, Rheumatology B Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Feb;51(2):333-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker319. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Work status is an important outcome in SpA. The objective was to assess work instability and its determinants in a cohort of patients with SpA, using the AS-work instability scale (AS-WIS).

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional monocentre study. Patients were definite SpA patients with paid work. Work instability was measured by the AS-WIS. Its determinants were assessed by correlations with SpA scores (BASDAI, BASFI and patient's global assessment) and patients with low work instability (AS-WIS score < 11) were compared with those with moderate to high instability, through backward logistic regression.

RESULTS

In all, 156 patients were assessed: mean (s.d.) age 41 (11) years, mean disease duration 15 (11) years; 71 (45.5%) were on TNF blockers. The mean AS-WIS score was 9.5 (5.5); 55 (35%) patients had moderate and 8 (5%) patients had high work instability. Correlations of the AS-WIS score with SpA scores were significant but moderate (BASDAI R = 0.42, BASFI R = 0.41, patient's global assessment R = 0.53; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, high patient's global assessment was the only element associated with moderate to high work instability; demographic characteristics and treatments were not significant elements.

CONCLUSION

Work instability was found to be high and its main determinant was patient's global assessment. The predictive validity of the AS-WIS in terms of job retention should be further assessed.

摘要

目的

工作状态是 AS 患者的一个重要结局。本研究旨在使用 AS 工作不稳定量表(AS-WIS)评估 AS 患者的工作不稳定及其决定因素。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面单中心研究。患者为有报酬工作的明确 AS 患者。通过 AS-WIS 测量工作不稳定情况。通过与 AS 评分(BASDAI、BASFI 和患者的总体评估)的相关性评估其决定因素,并通过向后逻辑回归比较 AS-WIS 评分较低(<11)和中高度不稳定的患者。

结果

共评估了 156 名患者:平均(标准差)年龄 41(11)岁,平均病程 15(11)年;71 名(45.5%)患者正在接受 TNF 阻滞剂治疗。AS-WIS 评分的平均值为 9.5(5.5);55 名(35%)患者为中高度不稳定,8 名(5%)患者为高度不稳定。AS-WIS 评分与 AS 评分的相关性显著但中度(BASDAI R=0.42,BASFI R=0.41,患者的总体评估 R=0.53;P<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,高患者的总体评估是与中高度工作不稳定相关的唯一因素;人口统计学特征和治疗不是显著因素。

结论

工作不稳定程度较高,其主要决定因素是患者的总体评估。AS-WIS 在保留工作方面的预测效度应进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验