Suppr超能文献

开发和验证一个在线互动式多媒体伤口护理算法程序。

Development and validation of an online interactive, multimedia wound care algorithms program.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health Sciences, La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;39(1):23-34. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182383f07.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide education based on evidence-based and validated wound care algorithms we designed and implemented an interactive, Web-based learning program for teaching wound care.

DESIGN

A mixed methods quantitative pilot study design with qualitative components was used to test and ascertain the ease of use, validity, and reliability of the online program.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

A convenience sample of 56 RN wound experts (formally educated, certified in wound care, or both) participated.

METHODS

The interactive, online program consists of a user introduction, interactive assessment of 15 acute and chronic wound photos, user feedback about the percentage correct, partially correct, or incorrect algorithm and dressing choices and a user survey. After giving consent, participants accessed the online program, provided answers to the demographic survey, and completed the assessment module and photographic test, along with a posttest survey.

RESULTS

The construct validity of the online interactive program was strong. Eighty-five percent (85%) of algorithm and 87% of dressing choices were fully correct even though some programming design issues were identified. Online study results were consistently better than previously conducted comparable paper-pencil study results. Using a 5-point Likert-type scale, participants rated the program's value and ease of use as 3.88 (valuable to very valuable) and 3.97 (easy to very easy), respectively. Similarly the research process was described qualitatively as "enjoyable" and "exciting."

CONCLUSION

This digital program was well received indicating its "perceived benefits" for nonexpert users, which may help reduce barriers to implementing safe, evidence-based care. Ongoing research using larger sample sizes may help refine the program or algorithms while identifying clinician educational needs. Initial design imperfections and programming problems identified also underscored the importance of testing all paper and Web-based programs designed to educate health care professionals or guide patient care.

摘要

目的

提供基于循证和验证的伤口护理算法的教育,我们设计并实施了一个互动的、基于网络的学习计划,用于教授伤口护理。

设计

使用混合方法的定量试点研究设计,结合定性部分,测试和确定在线计划的易用性、有效性和可靠性。

受试者和环境

56 名注册护士伤口专家(经过正规教育、伤口护理认证或两者兼有)参与了这项研究。

方法

互动式在线计划包括用户介绍、15 张急性和慢性伤口照片的互动评估、用户关于算法和敷料选择的正确、部分正确或不正确百分比的反馈,以及用户调查。在同意后,参与者访问在线计划,回答人口统计学调查,完成评估模块和照片测试,以及后测调查。

结果

在线互动计划的结构有效性很强。即使发现了一些编程设计问题,85%的算法和 87%的敷料选择是完全正确的。在线研究结果始终优于之前进行的类似纸笔研究结果。使用 5 点李克特量表,参与者分别将程序的价值和易用性评为 3.88(有价值到非常有价值)和 3.97(容易到非常容易)。同样,研究过程被定性地描述为“愉快”和“令人兴奋”。

结论

这个数字程序受到了很好的评价,表明它对非专业用户有“感知到的好处”,这可能有助于减少实施安全、基于证据的护理的障碍。使用更大的样本量进行的持续研究可能有助于改进程序或算法,同时确定临床医生的教育需求。初始设计缺陷和编程问题的识别也强调了测试旨在教育医疗保健专业人员或指导患者护理的所有纸质和基于网络的程序的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验