Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在慢性移植肾损伤中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic allograft injury.

作者信息

Shah P R, Kute V B, Saboo D S, Goplani K R, Gumber M R, Vanikar A V, Patel H V, Trivedi H L

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Nov;22(6):1128-32.

Abstract

Angiotensin II plays a crucial role in the development of chronic allograft injury (CAI). Clinical experience with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockade (ARBS) in CAI has unfortunately been limited. We carried out a prospective one year single center case controlled study to analyze the effect of ACEI /ARBS on the progression of CAI and in decreasing proteinuria. One hundred patients with CAI were evaluated. Of the 100 patients, 50 were selected to receive ACEI/ ARBS (group 1) and 50 managed without ACEI/ARBS (group 2). Their remaining management was similar in both the groups. Patients with hyperkalemia, history of allergic reactions, ACEI/ARBS intake and pregnancy were excluded. Average time for development of CAI was 19.6 ± 12.7 months in group 1 vs. 20.8 ± 12.8 in group 2. In group 1, mean systolic/diastolic BP was 136/82 mmHg at the time of establishment of CAI and 124/76 mmHg at the end of one year, and in group 2, it was 138/86 mmHg vs. 126/80 mmHg, respectively. Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 48.78 ± 13.4 in the former vs. 44.23 ± 8.14 in the latter. ACEI/ARBS administration was associated with stabilization of serum creatinine. GFR was maintained up to one year after CAI. Group 1 had a decrease in proteinuria by 1.41 g/day as compared with group 2 with proteinuria of 0.83 g/day. ACEI/ARBS administration is beneficial in CAI for BP control and significant decrease in proteinuria along with the stabilization of graft function.

摘要

血管紧张素II在慢性移植肾损伤(CAI)的发展过程中起关键作用。遗憾的是,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)在CAI方面的临床经验有限。我们进行了一项为期一年的前瞻性单中心病例对照研究,以分析ACEI/ARBs对CAI进展及降低蛋白尿的影响。对100例CAI患者进行了评估。在这100例患者中,50例被选接受ACEI/ARBs治疗(第1组),50例未接受ACEI/ARBs治疗(第2组)。两组的其余治疗措施相似。排除高钾血症、有过敏反应史、服用过ACEI/ARBs及妊娠的患者。第1组CAI的平均发病时间为19.6±12.7个月,第2组为20.8±12.8个月。在第1组中,CAI确诊时平均收缩压/舒张压为136/82 mmHg,一年结束时为124/76 mmHg;在第2组中,分别为138/86 mmHg和126/80 mmHg。前一组的平均肾小球滤过率(GFR)为48.78±13.4,后一组为44.23±8.14。服用ACEI/ARBs与血清肌酐稳定有关。CAI后GFR维持长达一年。与第2组蛋白尿为0.83 g/天相比,第1组蛋白尿减少了1.41 g/天。服用ACEI/ARBs对CAI患者控制血压、显著降低蛋白尿及稳定移植肾功能有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验